- From: Matthew Ratzloff <matt@builtfromsource.com>
- Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 12:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
- To: public-html@w3.org
On Sat, March 17, 2007 12:33 pm, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 20:28:50 +0100, Matthew Ratzloff > <matt@builtfromsource.com> wrote: >> I don't understand why a <video> element is "easier to manipulate than >> [an] <object> element". How does a unique name make it easier to work >> with? > > Having a dedicated API allows for a dedicated API. I tried to elaborate on > this on my blog earlier today: > > http://annevankesteren.nl/2007/03/video I thought the comments raised some valid points. Do Flash videos use the <video> element or the <object> element? Is there going to be an <audio> element as well? Why not <media>, since the principles of video and audio are basically the same? -Matt
Received on Saturday, 17 March 2007 19:48:53 UTC