public-tracking@w3.org from October 2013 by date

Thursday, 31 October 2013

Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect Dobbs, Brooks
Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect Lee Tien
Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect Dobbs, Brooks
RE: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect Chris Pedigo
Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect David Singer
Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect David Singer
Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect Lee Tien
Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect Vinay Goel

Wednesday, 30 October 2013

Re: Issue-5 Proposal-7 Roy T. Fielding
Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect Dobbs, Brooks
RE: Issue-5 Proposal-7 Mike O'Neill
Re: Issue-5 Proposal-7 Rob van Eijk
Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect Walter van Holst
Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect Roy T. Fielding
Re: Please Re-Open Issue-47 Chris Mejia
Re: Issue-5 Proposal-7 Roy T. Fielding
RE: Please Re-Open Issue-47 Shane M Wiley
Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect Vinay Goel
Please Re-Open Issue-47 Shane M Wiley
RE: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect Shane M Wiley
Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect Vinay Goel
RE: Issue-5 Proposal-7 Rob van Eijk
RE: Issue-5 Proposal-7 JC Cannon
Re: Issue-5 Proposal-7 Rob van Eijk
Re: Plan moving forward Rob van Eijk
Re: Plan moving forward Chris Mejia
Re: ISSUE-10 proposed text for discussion Chris Mejia
Re: Agenda for tomorrow, Issue-5 input, and regrets Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Re: Agenda for tomorrow, Issue-5 input, and regrets Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Issue-5 Proposal-7 Mike O'Neill
RE: ISSUE-10 proposed text for discussion Mike O'Neill
ISSUE-10 proposed text for discussion Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Re: Agenda for tomorrow, Issue-5 input, and regrets David Singer

Tuesday, 29 October 2013

Re: Agenda for tomorrow David Singer
Re: Plan moving forward イアンフェッティ
Re: Plan moving forward Alan Chapell
Plan moving forward Carl Cargill
Agenda for tomorrow Carl Cargill
RE: EU participants: Telco may be 1h earlier this week Mike O'Neill
fyi: EU participants: Telco may be 1h earlier this week Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)

Friday, 25 October 2013

RE: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Shane M Wiley
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Roy T. Fielding
RE: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Shane M Wiley
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Roy T. Fielding
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Roy T. Fielding
Re: Thinking Ahead - Thanksgiving Week Justin Brookman
RE: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Shane M Wiley
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection David Wainberg
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Roy T. Fielding
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Walter van Holst
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Justin Brookman
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Jack L. Hobaugh Jr
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Justin Brookman
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Justin Brookman
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection David Wainberg
RE: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Mike O'Neill
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Justin Brookman
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection David Wainberg
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Justin Brookman
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Marc Groman
RE: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Shane M Wiley
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Justin Brookman
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Justin Brookman
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection David Wainberg
Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection John Simpson
RE: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Shane M Wiley
Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)

Thursday, 24 October 2013

RE: Issue 24 - Consensus Shane M Wiley
Re: Issue 24 - Consensus Walter van Holst
RE: Issue 24 - Consensus Shane M Wiley
Re: Issue 24 - Consensus Walter van Holst
RE: Issue 24 - Consensus Shane M Wiley
Re: Issue 24 - Consensus David Singer
ISSUE-10: Discoverability Justin Brookman

Wednesday, 23 October 2013

Re: Thinking Ahead - Thanksgiving Week David Singer
Thinking Ahead - Thanksgiving Week Shane M Wiley
RE: Issue 24 - Consensus Shane M Wiley
Re: Issue 24 - Consensus Walter van Holst
Re: Issue 24 - Consensus John Simpson
RE: Issue 24 - Consensus Shane M Wiley
Re: Apologies.. Walter van Holst
Re: Agenda 10.23.13 - Input on ISSUE-5 mts-std@schunter.org
Re: Apologies.. Ninja Marnau
Apologies.. John Simpson
Issue 24 - Consensus Carl Cargill

Tuesday, 22 October 2013

Issue 5: Is this in the wiki? Alan Chapell

Monday, 21 October 2013

Agenda 10.23.13 Justin Brookman
Re: Additional documentation for Issue-227 Jack L. Hobaugh Jr

Sunday, 20 October 2013

Re: Additional documentation for Issue-236 Nicholas Doty
Re: Additional documentation for Issue-235 Nicholas Doty
Re: Additional documentation for Issue-234 Nicholas Doty
Re: Change proposal re: DNT: 0 Nicholas Doty
Re: Additional documentation for Issue-233 Nicholas Doty
Re: Additional documentation for Issue-231 Nicholas Doty
Re: Additional documentation for Issue-230 Nicholas Doty
Re: Additional documentation for Issue-229 Nicholas Doty
Re: Additional documentation for Issue-228 Nicholas Doty
Re: Additional documentation for Issue-227 Nicholas Doty
tracking our change proposals Nicholas Doty

Friday, 18 October 2013

Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Roy T. Fielding

Thursday, 17 October 2013

ISSUE-25 proposed changes Kathy Joe
Change proposal ISSUE-234 David Wainberg
Additional documentation for Issue-237 Jack Hobaugh
Additional documentation for Issue-232 Jack Hobaugh
Additional documentation for Issue-236 Jack Hobaugh
Additional documentation for Issue-235 Jack Hobaugh
Additional documentation for Issue-234 Jack Hobaugh
Additional documentation for Issue-233 Jack Hobaugh
Additional documentation for Issue-231 Jack Hobaugh
Additional documentation for Issue-230 Jack Hobaugh
Additional documentation for Issue-229 Jack Hobaugh
Additional documentation for Issue-228 Jack Hobaugh
Additional documentation for Issue-227 Jack Hobaugh

Wednesday, 16 October 2013

Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? David Singer
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? David Singer
Re: My comments, as promised during the call Jeff Jaffe
My comments, as promised during the call Walter van Holst
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Walter van Holst
RE: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Shane M Wiley
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Jeff Jaffe
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Jeffrey Chester
RE: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Carl Cargill
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Justin Brookman
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Walter van Holst
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? David Wainberg
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Jeffrey Chester
RE: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Shane M Wiley
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Jack L. Hobaugh Jr
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Walter van Holst
RE: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Carl Cargill
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? David Wainberg
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Jeffrey Chester
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Roy T. Fielding
RE: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Carl Cargill
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Thomas Schauf
Re: Change Proposals: Issue 10 Nicholas Doty
Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call Nicholas Doty
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Mike Zaneis
RE: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Carl Cargill
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) David Singer
Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call Nicholas Doty
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Mike Zaneis
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) David Singer
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Mike Zaneis
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) David Singer
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Mike Zaneis

Tuesday, 15 October 2013

Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) David Singer
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? David Singer
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Roy T. Fielding
RE: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Mike Zaneis
RE: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Carl Cargill
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? David Singer
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? David Wainberg
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? David Singer
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Jack L. Hobaugh Jr
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Mike O'Neill

Monday, 14 October 2013

TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) Carl Cargill

Saturday, 12 October 2013

RE: Issue-5, trying to find a middle ground Mike O'Neill
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? David Singer

Friday, 11 October 2013

Issue-5, trying to find a middle ground David Singer
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Roy T. Fielding
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Matthias Schunter (Intel)
RE: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Mike O'Neill
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Walter van Holst
RE: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Mike O'Neill
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Vinay Goel
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Roy T. Fielding
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? David Singer

Thursday, 10 October 2013

RE: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Mike O'Neill
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? John Simpson
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? John Simpson
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)

Wednesday, 9 October 2013

Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions David Wainberg
RE: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Mike O'Neill
Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Roy T. Fielding
Re: issue-24 proposal 2 David Singer
Re: issue-24 proposal 2 Roy T. Fielding
TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V01) Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Poll closes tonight! Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
issue-24 proposal 2 David Singer
Re: Change Proposals: Issue 10 Alan Chapell
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Re: Discussion of Issue-5 (definition of tracking), and a new CP Roy T. Fielding
Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 Roy T. Fielding
Re: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft Nicholas Doty
Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 Nicholas Doty
Re: Discussion of Issue-5 (definition of tracking), and a new CP Nicholas Doty

Tuesday, 8 October 2013

Re: Discussion of Issue-5 (definition of tracking), and a new CP David Singer
Re: Discussion of Issue-5 (definition of tracking), and a new CP Brad Kulick
regrets for tomorrow's call David Wainberg
Your input on the way forward Wendy Seltzer
Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions David Wainberg
Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions Justin Brookman
Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions David Wainberg
Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions John Simpson
Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions Justin Brookman
Re: Change Proposals: Issue 10 Alan Chapell
New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions David Wainberg
Re: Change Proposals: Issue 10 Jeffrey Chester
Re: Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text David Wainberg
Re: Change Proposals: Issue 10 John Simpson
Re: Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text John Simpson
Re: Discussion of Issue-5 (definition of tracking), and a new CP David Singer
RE: Discussion of Issue-5 (definition of tracking), and a new CP Shane M Wiley
Change Proposals: Issue 10 Alan Chapell
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) Jack L. Hobaugh Jr
RE: Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 Shane M Wiley
RE: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] Shane M Wiley
RE: Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 Mike O'Neill
RE: Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 Shane M Wiley
RE: Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 Mike O'Neill
Re: Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 David Wainberg
Re: change proposal to issue-25 Jeffrey Chester
Re: Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 Joseph Lorenzo Hall
RE: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] Mike O'Neill
RE: Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 Mike O'Neill
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Discussion of Issue-5 (definition of tracking), and a new CP David Singer
Re: Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text David Wainberg

Monday, 7 October 2013

RE: change proposal to issue-25 Israel, Susan
RE: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] Shane M Wiley
RE: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] Shane M Wiley
RE: change proposal to issue-25 Shane M Wiley
Re: change proposal to issue-25 John Simpson
RE: change proposal to issue-25 Shane M Wiley
Re: Clarifying end of poll timing Brad Kulick
Re: Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text John Simpson
Clarifying end of poll timing Brad Kulick
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) David Singer
RE: Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 Shane M Wiley
Re: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft David Singer
Re: Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text David Wainberg
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) Jack L. Hobaugh Jr
TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
45 issues to go + On the Status of ISSUEs (Raised, Open, Pending Review) Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Re: Re-opening an issue Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text Rob Sherman
Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call Rob Sherman
Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call Rob Sherman
tracking-ISSUE-238 ( Permitted uses ): Scope of Permitted uses Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
RE: text edits related to "raised" issues Israel, Susan
Re-opening an issue Israel, Susan
editorial change Israel, Susan

Friday, 4 October 2013

Thursday, 3 October 2013

Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] David Wainberg
Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] John Simpson
Re: ISSUE-25: Audience measurement research Rigo Wenning
RE: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft Mike O'Neill
ISSUE-25: Audience measurement research Kathy Joe
RE: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] Mike O'Neill
RE: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft Israel, Susan
Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V03) Jack L. Hobaugh Jr
Re: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft Justin Brookman
Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] Rob Sherman
Re: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft Dobbs, Brooks
Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] David Wainberg
RE: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] Mike O'Neill
Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] Walter van Holst
TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V03) Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] Rob Sherman
Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call Rob Sherman
Re: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft Justin Brookman
Re: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft Chris Pedigo
Re: Non-editorial change, issue 5 Roy T. Fielding
Re: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft Justin Brookman
Re: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft Nicholas Doty
Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft Vinay Goel
Re: Non-editorial change, issue 5 John Simpson
Re: Non-editorial change, issue 5 Roy T. Fielding

Wednesday, 2 October 2013

Re: Non-editorial change, issue 5 John Simpson
Re: Non-editorial change, issue 5 Nicholas Doty
Re: change proposal to issue-25 John Simpson
Re: change proposal to issue-25 Vinay Goel
Re: change proposal to issue-25 John Simpson
Change proposal First Party Compliance issue-170 Mike O'Neill
Re: change proposal to issue-25 Jeffrey Chester
change proposal to issue-25 Mike O'Neill
Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-5 Definition of Tracking Alan Chapell
tracking-ISSUE-237 (Financial Logging): Revise Financial Logging section [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-236 (Frequency Capping): Adjust Frequency Capping section [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-235 (Reasonable Security): Adjust Reasonable Security section [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-234 (No Personalization): Remove "No Personalization" section [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-233 (Data Minimization): Data Minimization, Retention and Transparency [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-232 (Permitted Uses: Transparency): Permitted Uses: Transparency [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-231 (Permitted Uses): General Principles for Permitted Uses [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-230 (New Definition): Add a definition for "Web Browsing History" [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-229 (Party Definition): Adjustment to Party definition [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. Justin Brookman
Re: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. Jack L. Hobaugh Jr
Re: tracking-ISSUE-228 (Network Interaction): Revise the Network Interaction definition [Compliance Current] Justin Brookman
tracking-ISSUE-228 (Network Interaction): Revise the Network Interaction definition [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Non-editorial change, issue 5 John Simpson
tracking-ISSUE-227 (User Agent Minimum Requirements): User Agent Minimum Requirements [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. David Wainberg
Re: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Re: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. David Wainberg
Re: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V02) Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
tracking-ISSUE-226 (Rules by context): What rules apply for data collection/use, by context [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
Non-editorial change, issue 5 Carl Cargill
RE: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. Israel, Susan
Re: New Change Proposal: Clarification of Compliance to User Choice (Issue-205) John Simpson
Re: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. David Wainberg
Note: Deadlines for individual ISSUEs are announced as part of the agenda Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
List of ISSUEs on our radar (attached to the Compliance-Current product) Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
deadlines Israel, Susan
open issues against current draft David Wainberg
Re: ISSUE-208: attach to current draft Nicholas Doty
Re: ISSUE-208: attach to current draft Roy T. Fielding
ISSUE-208: attach to current draft David Wainberg
tracking-ISSUE-225 (Clarification of Compliance to User Choice in TPE): Clarification of Compliance to User Choice in TPE [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-224 (Clarification of Compliance to User Choice): Clarification of Compliance to User Choice (Issue-205) [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-223 (implementation criteria): Define criteria now for the test/implementation phase of the compliance spec [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] Walter van Holst
Re: tracking-ISSUE-222 (personalization): Personalization or customizing of content should be allowed under certain collection/use limitations [Compliance Current] Walter van Holst
New Change Proposal: Clarification of Compliance to User Choice (Issue-205) SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
Re: tracking-ISSUE-222 (personalization): Personalization or customizing of content should be allowed under certain collection/use limitations [Compliance Current] Jeffrey Chester
tracking-ISSUE-222 (personalization): Personalization or customizing of content should be allowed under certain collection/use limitations [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-221 (Context): Define collection and use by context rather than party Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] Justin Brookman
ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call Kathy Joe
tracking-ISSUE-220 (Proportionality): Proportionality should be across the board [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 Mike O'Neill
Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting Jeffrey Chester
tracking-ISSUE-218: Data that is out of scope [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
tracking-ISSUE-217: Terminology for user action, interaction, and network interaction [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting Geoff Gieron - AdTruth

Tuesday, 1 October 2013

Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting Geoff Gieron - AdTruth
Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting Joseph Lorenzo Hall
Re: wrong definition of tracking in TCS Rigo Wenning
Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting Alan Chapell
RE: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) Mike O'Neill
Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting Jeffrey Chester
Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) David Wainberg
RE: Issue:? Fingerprinting Mike O'Neill
Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting Walter van Holst
Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting Alan Chapell
RE: Issue:? Fingerprinting Mike O'Neill
Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) Justin Brookman
Re: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 Lee Tien
Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting Justin Brookman
Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-5 Definition of Tracking Alan Chapell
Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-5 Definition of Tracking Justin Brookman
Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) Lee Tien
RE: Reminder: Deadline for raising issues is October 02 (this Wednesday) issue-205, issue-189 Mike O'Neill
tracking-ISSUE-216 (Contracts and Branding): Does �??Contractual relationships and branding�?? provide an equal level of privacy controls as �??ownership and branding�?? in the context of DNT? [Compliance Current] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
Issue:? Fingerprinting Jeffrey Chester
Change proposal for ISSUE-5 Definition of Tracking Alan Chapell
RE: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 Israel, Susan
Re: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 Justin Brookman
RE: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 Israel, Susan
Agenda for the October 02 call (V01) Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)
Re: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 Justin Brookman
Re: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 Jeffrey Chester
Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 Mike O'Neill
RE: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) Mike O'Neill
Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) David Wainberg
Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) Walter van Holst
Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) Dobbs, Brooks
Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) David Wainberg
RE: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) Mike O'Neill
Re: Compliance document updates for review before next WD publication (was CVS WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts) Nicholas Doty
Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) Vinay Goel
Re: wrong definition of tracking in TCS Roy T. Fielding
Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) David Wainberg
Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) John Simpson

Last message date: Thursday, 31 October 2013 17:07:56 UTC