W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2013

Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro?

From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 15:25:53 -0700
Cc: public-tracking@w3.org
Message-id: <74E561FD-E5E5-4AE8-B538-71E6D3DA12A3@apple.com>
To: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>

On Oct 16, 2013, at 9:50 , Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl> wrote:

> On 16/10/2013 18:44, Shane M Wiley wrote:
>> Walter,
>> 
>> I believe SAME-PARTY works as well from a technical (TPE)
>> perspective.  It takes me just as much work to update a list on a web
>> page as it does in an xml resource file so we'd likely do both (human
>> readable vs. machine readable).
> 
> Which is another argument in favour of SAME-PARTY: no higher burden of
> implementation while providing a more objectively and consistent way of
> providing the required transparency for the user.

yes, and it's amenable to machine-checking, which is a big advantage for both sides.

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 16 October 2013 22:26:20 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:19 UTC