W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2013

RE: ISSUE-10 proposed text for discussion

From: Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:23:44 -0000
To: "'Matthias Schunter \(Intel Corporation\)'" <mts-std@schunter.org>, <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <055901ced573$42540140$c6fc03c0$@baycloud.com>
Hi Matthias,

 

Other than a service provider acting on behalf of the user (third-party
definition) is a new one. I thought the definition of a service provider
meant they were acting in the shoes of the first-party i.e. a data processor
only acting on behalf of, and under contract with, a data controller. Acting
on behalf of the user seems too broad, what use-case would it refer too?

 

Mike

 

From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) [mailto:mts-std@schunter.org] 
Sent: 30 October 2013 13:02
To: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
Subject: ISSUE-10 proposed text for discussion

 

Hi Team,

I tried to edit the proposed inputs that built on each other and were
largely complementary into a cohesive overall text.
I have taken the base text, added options (2), (4),  and (5). ((4) should
also satisfy (7)

My goal for the call is to further change this text into a consensus
proposal. If this is not possible, we should aim for a complete alternative
text to go into the CfO.


Regards,
matthias


Party
<http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html#
party>  


(from (3):) A party is a natural person, a legal entity, or a set of legal
entities that share common owner(s), common controller(s), and a group
identity that is easily discoverable by a user.  (from (2):) Parties MUST
provide transparency about what affiliates are considered part of the same
party. Examples of ways to provide this transparency are through common
branding or by providing a list of affiliates that is available via a link
from a resource where a party describes DNT practices. 


First Party
<http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html#
first-party>  


(from (4)): Within the context of a given user action, a first party is a
party with which the user intends to interact, via one or more network
interactions, as a result of making that action. Merely hovering over,
muting, pausing, or closing a given piece of content does not constitute a
user's intent to interact with another party. 

(from (0):) In most network interactions, there will be only one first party
with which the user intends to interact. (from (4):) In some cases, a
resource on the Web will be jointly controlled by two or more distinct
parties. Each of those parties is considered a first party if a user would
reasonably expect to communicate with all of them when accessing that
resource. For example, prominent co-branding on the resource might lead a
user to expect that multiple parties are responsible for the content or
functionality.

(from (0)): NOTE: The party that owns and operates or has control over a
branded or labeled embedded widget, search box, or similar service with
which a user intentionally interacts is also considered a first party. If a
user merely mouses over, closes, or mutes such content, that is not
sufficient interaction to render the party a first party. 


Third Party
<http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/drafts/tracking-compliance.html#
third-party>  


(from (5):) For any data collected as a result of one or more network
interactions resulting from a user's action, a third party is any party
other than that user, a first party for that user action, or a service
provider acting on behalf of either that user or that first party. 

  
Received on Wednesday, 30 October 2013 13:24:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:19 UTC