W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2013

Re: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06.

From: David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 14:36:33 -0400
Message-ID: <524C67B1.9050801@appnexus.com>
To: "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>
CC: <public-tracking@w3.org>, <public-tracking-announce@w3.org>
Hi Matthias,

Thanks much to you and the other chairs for this. One question. Does the 
extension apply to making change proposals against the subset of issues, 
5, 10, 24, 25, and 170?



On 2013-10-02 2:28 PM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote:
> Hi Susan,
> thanks a lot for raising this concern. We have discussed this request 
> among the chairs and we realized that it will not
> impact our ability to get started with processing issues.
> As a consequence, we changed the deadline for raising new issues to 
> Sunday, October 06. By this date, all issues that are important for 
> the compliance draft should be attached to the "Compliance-current" 
> product and therefore be documented (with whatever state) in this list:
> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/products/5
> We have updated the list of important dates at:
> http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG#Tracking_Protection_Working_Group
> In addition to these important (general) dates, we will annouce 
> additional deadlines for each individual ISSUE in the agenda (like we 
> have done so far: "initial call for change proposals, final call for 
> change proposals, ...").
> I hope this resolves your concern.
> Regards,
> matthias
> On 02/10/2013 20:15, Israel, Susan wrote:
>> For the benefit of the list, here is a restatement of a couple of 
>> questions raised during the call.
>> 1.Since we are a bit confused about deadlines and the status of 
>> issues on the existing list, would it be possible to  extend the 
>> deadline for raising  issues, which seems to be today,  until Friday?
>> 2.Would it be possible to send a simple and complete list of the 
>> relevant upcoming deadlines, as they currently stand,  to the list?  
>> Some of us seem to have missed or become confused about some nuances 
>> here.
>> Perhaps a simple restatement would help us spend less time on  the 
>> process questions.  Thanks.
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 18:36:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:19 UTC