- From: Shane M Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:24:01 +0000
- To: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Walter, This isn't a question of proportionality - and that is already covered as a guiding principle for ALL Permitted Uses. This is about setting up a false expectation where the technical realities have already proven this is not viable. - Shane -----Original Message----- From: Walter van Holst [mailto:walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:01 AM To: public-tracking@w3.org Subject: Re: Issue 24 - Consensus On 23/10/2013 18:12, Shane M Wiley wrote: > I would respectfully request the second paragraph be dropped and we > stick with the initial paragraph only as this covers the issue > completely, mentions "graduated response" but doesn't over-emphasis > that perspective. > This is extremely objectionable. The principle of proportionality is a core concept in privacy. Regards, Walter
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2013 17:25:08 UTC