W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2013

RE: Issue 24 - Consensus

From: Shane M Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:24:01 +0000
To: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DCCF036E573F0142BD90964789F720E3141C3555@GQ1-MB01-02.y.corp.yahoo.com>

This isn't a question of proportionality - and that is already covered as a guiding principle for ALL Permitted Uses.  This is about setting up a false expectation where the technical realities have already proven this is not viable.  

- Shane

-----Original Message-----
From: Walter van Holst [mailto:walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 10:01 AM
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Subject: Re: Issue 24 - Consensus

On 23/10/2013 18:12, Shane M Wiley wrote:

> I would respectfully request the second paragraph be dropped and we 
> stick with the initial paragraph only as this covers the issue 
> completely, mentions "graduated response" but doesn't over-emphasis 
> that perspective.

This is extremely objectionable. The principle of proportionality is a core concept in privacy.


Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2013 17:25:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:19 UTC