W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2013

RE: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06.

From: Israel, Susan <Susan_Israel@Comcast.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 18:36:45 +0000
To: "'Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)'" <mts-std@schunter.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>
CC: "public-tracking-announce@w3.org" <public-tracking-announce@w3.org>
Message-ID: <002D28EAE1A7D7459AC4810CD6D7234DC77296E4@PACDCEXMB14.cable.comcast.com>
Thank you, Mathhias.  That flexibility is appreciated.

From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) [mailto:mts-std@schunter.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2013 2:29 PM
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Cc: public-tracking-announce@w3.org
Subject: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06.

Hi Susan,

thanks a lot for raising this concern. We have discussed this request among the chairs and we realized that it will not
impact our ability to get started with processing issues.

As a consequence, we changed the deadline for raising new issues to Sunday, October 06. By this date, all issues that are important for the compliance draft should be attached to the "Compliance-current" product and therefore be documented (with whatever state) in this list:

We have updated the list of important dates at:

In addition to these important (general) dates, we will annouce additional deadlines for each individual ISSUE in the agenda (like we have done so far: "initial call for change proposals, final call for change proposals, ...").

I hope this resolves your concern.


On 02/10/2013 20:15, Israel, Susan wrote:
For the benefit of the list, here is a restatement of a couple of questions raised during the call.

1.       Since we are a bit confused about deadlines and the status of issues on the existing list, would it be possible to  extend the deadline for raising  issues, which seems to be today,  until Friday?

2.       Would it be possible to send a simple and complete list of the relevant upcoming deadlines, as they currently stand,  to the list?  Some of us seem to have missed or become confused about some nuances here.

Perhaps a simple restatement would help us spend less time on  the process questions.  Thanks.
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 18:38:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:19 UTC