Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V03)

Hi Matthias,

Thank you for providing the agenda.

Based on the V03 change statement below regarding "whether a consensus emerges," it would appear that the TPWG will only have from the submission deadline on October 8 until the end of the weekly TPWG teleconference on October 9 to reach consensus before the chairs move the process into a "Call for Objections."

Is that an accurate interpretation?

If my interpretation is incorrect, please provide the deadline for the TPWG to reach a consensus for ISSUE-5 and ISSUE-10 before the chairs move the process into a Call for Objections.

Best regards,

Jack

Jack L. Hobaugh Jr
Network Advertising Initiative | Counsel & Senior Director of Technology 
1634 Eye St. NW, Suite 750 Washington, DC 20006
P: 202-347-5341 | jack@networkadvertising.org





On Oct 3, 2013, at 2:07 AM, "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org> wrote:

> Hi Team,
> 
> 
> enclosed is the first draft of an agenda for next Wednesday.
> Feedback/comments are welcome.
> 
> V03:
> - I realized that the deadline for final change proposals for ISSUE-5 and ISSUE-10 should be October 08
>   to ensure we have a final list of change proposals before the call where we discuss them
>   to see whether a consensus emerges. Changed october 09 to October 08.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> matthias
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> 1. Confirmation of scribe.  Volunteers welcome
> 
> 2. Offline-caller-identification (see end for instructions)
> 
> 3. Survey of newly raised issues if any (authors of issues)
>     - If you have added an issue, I would like to learn about the new issue
>       by means of its author explaining the issue and the proposed resolution
> 
> 4. Discussion on testing of specifications (Carl)
> 
> ----------------------------------
> ---- issues for this Call ---
> 
> Note: See more info at the end for details.
> 
> 5.  ISSUE-10 [Justin]
>      http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/10
>      http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Party_Definitions
>     DEADLINES for ISSUE-10:
>     October 02: M1 Call for final list of change proposals 
>     October 08: M2 List of change proposals is frozen + Discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal     
>   
> 6. ISSUE-5  [Matthias]
>     http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/5
>      http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Tracking_Definition
>     DEADLINES for ISSUE-5:
>     October 02: M1 Call for final list of change proposals 
>     October 08: M2 List of change proposals is frozen + Discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal     
>   
> 7. ISSUE-24 [Carl]
>      http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/24
>      http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Security
> 
>     DEADLINES for ISSUE-24:
>     Oct 02: M0: Initial call for change proposals; Submit all change proposals 
>     Oct 08: M1 Call for final list of change proposals 
> 
> 08. ISSUE-25 [Justin]
>      http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/25
>      http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Audience_Measurement
> 
>     DEADLINES for ISSUE-25:
>     Oct 02: M0: Initial call for change proposals; Submit all change proposals 
>     Oct 08: M1 Discuss change proposals + Call for final list of change proposals  
> 
> 09. ISSUE-170 [Matthias] Definition of and what/whether limitations around data append and first parties
>      http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/170
>      http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_First_Party_Compliance
> 
>     DEADLINES for ISSUE-170:
>     Oct 09: M0: Initial call for change proposals; Submit all change proposals 
>     Oct 15: M1 Discuss change proposals + Call for final list of change proposals 
> 
> 09. ISSUE-16 [Carl] Definition of and what/whether limitations around data append and first parties
>      http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/16
>      http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_Transience_Collection
> 
>     DEADLINES for ISSUE-170: What does it mean to collect, retain, use and share data?
>     Oct 09: M0: Initial call for change proposals; Submit all change proposals 
>     Oct 15: M1 Discuss change proposals + Call for final list of change proposals 
> 
> ================ Summary Documentation on Resolving ISSUES =================
> Complete list of issues against the compliance-current spec:
>  http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/products/5
> 
> PHASES to resolve issues:
> M0 (announcement): Initial call for change proposals; All change proposals should be drafted
> M1 (discussion): Initial change proposals have been submitted; Discussion on change proposals; Call for final list of change proposals
> M2 (discussion): List of change proposals is frozen; Discussion whether clear consensus emerges for one change proposal
> M3 (announcement): Call for objections to validate / determine consensus
> M5 (deadline): Deadline for inputs to call for objections (2 weeks after M3); Analysis starts
> M7 (announcement): Results are announced
> 
> STATUS of the ISSUES:
> - OPEN During phases M0, M1, M2 
> - PENDING REVIEW: During phases M3, M5
> - CLOSED after M7
> All other issues are RAISED.
> -----
> This URL
> As indicated in our plan, the following issues are currently OPEN for discussion in our calls. 
> ================ Infrastructure =================
> 
> Zakim teleconference bridge:
> VoIP:    sip:zakim@voip.w3.org
> Phone +1.617.761.6200 passcode TRACK (87225)
> IRC Chat: irc.w3.org<http://irc.w3.org/>, port 6665, #dnt
> 
> OFFLINE caller identification:
> If you intend to join the phone call, you must either associate your
> phone number with your IRC username once you've joined the call
> (command: "Zakim, [ID] is [name]" e.g., "Zakim, ??P19 is schunter" in my
> case), or let Nick know your phone number ahead of time. If you are not
> comfortable with the Zakim IRC syntax for associating your phone number,
> please email your name and phone number to
> npdoty@w3.org<mailto:npdoty@w3.org>. We want to reduce (in fact,
> eliminate) the time spent on the call identifying phone numbers. Note
> that if your number is not identified and you do not respond to
> off-the-phone reminders via IRC, you will be dropped from the call.
>