- From: David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2013 15:17:00 -0400
- To: "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>
- CC: <public-tracking@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <524C712C.7090906@appnexus.com>
So Oct 9? Sorry for being pushy, but I and probably others are still getting our minds around all the deadlines and new process. After my mix up with publishing the WD, I want to be absolutely sure I'm not confused about any other deadlines. Thanks much for your patience. -David On 2013-10-02 3:12 PM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote: > Hi David, > > the deadlines for issues 5, 10, 25, 25, 170, and newly added 16 remain > unchanged as documented in the agenda for this and next week. > > Matthias > > On 02/10/2013 21:08, David Wainberg wrote: >> Thanks, Matthias. My understanding has been that we can submit change >> proposals against issues 5,10,24,25, and 170 through EOD today. So >> that remains the case? >> >> On 2013-10-02 3:06 PM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote: >>> Hi David, >>> >>> >>> thanks for asking. >>> >>> The extension only allows to continue to raise new issues. >>> >>> This extension does not affect issues 5, 10, 24, 25, 170 or any >>> other issue that are sufficiently documented already: >>> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/products/5 >>> >>> It also does not affect the deadline on October 16 for finalising >>> the documentation for all issues or the deadlines we set in the >>> agenda for processing our issues. >>> >>> Does this resolve your question? >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> matthias >>> >>> >>> >>> On 02/10/2013 20:36, David Wainberg wrote: >>>> Hi Matthias, >>>> >>>> Thanks much to you and the other chairs for this. One question. >>>> Does the extension apply to making change proposals against the >>>> subset of issues, 5, 10, 24, 25, and 170? >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> David >>>> >>>> On 2013-10-02 2:28 PM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote: >>>>> Hi Susan, >>>>> >>>>> thanks a lot for raising this concern. We have discussed this >>>>> request among the chairs and we realized that it will not >>>>> impact our ability to get started with processing issues. >>>>> >>>>> As a consequence, we changed the deadline for raising new issues >>>>> to Sunday, October 06. By this date, all issues that are important >>>>> for the compliance draft should be attached to the >>>>> "Compliance-current" product and therefore be documented (with >>>>> whatever state) in this list: >>>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/products/5 >>>>> >>>>> We have updated the list of important dates at: >>>>> http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG#Tracking_Protection_Working_Group >>>>> >>>>> In addition to these important (general) dates, we will annouce >>>>> additional deadlines for each individual ISSUE in the agenda (like >>>>> we have done so far: "initial call for change proposals, final >>>>> call for change proposals, ..."). >>>>> >>>>> I hope this resolves your concern. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> matthias >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 02/10/2013 20:15, Israel, Susan wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> For the benefit of the list, here is a restatement of a couple of >>>>>> questions raised during the call. >>>>>> >>>>>> 1.Since we are a bit confused about deadlines and the status of >>>>>> issues on the existing list, would it be possible to extend the >>>>>> deadline for raising issues, which seems to be today, until >>>>>> Friday? >>>>>> >>>>>> 2.Would it be possible to send a simple and complete list of the >>>>>> relevant upcoming deadlines, as they currently stand, to the >>>>>> list? Some of us seem to have missed or become confused about >>>>>> some nuances here. >>>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps a simple restatement would help us spend less time on >>>>>> the process questions. Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 19:17:23 UTC