Re: issue-24 proposal 2

OK

maybe worth a note in the document that if the blanket remains, then this phrase is redundant.  (I think the blanket will remain.)

On Oct 9, 2013, at 12:14 , Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:

> On Oct 9, 2013, at 10:20 AM, David Singer wrote:
> 
>> …contains "provided that such data is not used for operational behavior (profiling or personalization)".  But this is a blanket requirement for all permitted uses;  data held for a permitted use can only be used for that use, and no other purpose.  If you need another purpose, you have to claim another permitted use.  So I would remove this phrase, myself.
> 
> I don't think we have recorded consensus on that other section,
> but I agree this part is not necessary if the blanket requirement remains.
> 
> ....Roy
> 

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 19:17:48 UTC