- From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) <mts-std@schunter.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 21:12:16 +0200
- To: David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com>
- CC: public-tracking@w3.org
- Message-ID: <524C7010.50900@schunter.org>
Hi David, the deadlines for issues 5, 10, 25, 25, 170, and newly added 16 remain unchanged as documented in the agenda for this and next week. Matthias On 02/10/2013 21:08, David Wainberg wrote: > Thanks, Matthias. My understanding has been that we can submit change > proposals against issues 5,10,24,25, and 170 through EOD today. So > that remains the case? > > On 2013-10-02 3:06 PM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> >> thanks for asking. >> >> The extension only allows to continue to raise new issues. >> >> This extension does not affect issues 5, 10, 24, 25, 170 or any other >> issue that are sufficiently documented already: >> https://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/products/5 >> >> It also does not affect the deadline on October 16 for finalising the >> documentation for all issues or the deadlines we set in the agenda >> for processing our issues. >> >> Does this resolve your question? >> >> >> Regards, >> matthias >> >> >> >> On 02/10/2013 20:36, David Wainberg wrote: >>> Hi Matthias, >>> >>> Thanks much to you and the other chairs for this. One question. Does >>> the extension apply to making change proposals against the subset of >>> issues, 5, 10, 24, 25, and 170? >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> David >>> >>> On 2013-10-02 2:28 PM, Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) wrote: >>>> Hi Susan, >>>> >>>> thanks a lot for raising this concern. We have discussed this >>>> request among the chairs and we realized that it will not >>>> impact our ability to get started with processing issues. >>>> >>>> As a consequence, we changed the deadline for raising new issues to >>>> Sunday, October 06. By this date, all issues that are important for >>>> the compliance draft should be attached to the "Compliance-current" >>>> product and therefore be documented (with whatever state) in this list: >>>> http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/products/5 >>>> >>>> We have updated the list of important dates at: >>>> http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG#Tracking_Protection_Working_Group >>>> >>>> In addition to these important (general) dates, we will annouce >>>> additional deadlines for each individual ISSUE in the agenda (like >>>> we have done so far: "initial call for change proposals, final call >>>> for change proposals, ..."). >>>> >>>> I hope this resolves your concern. >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> matthias >>>> >>>> >>>> On 02/10/2013 20:15, Israel, Susan wrote: >>>>> >>>>> For the benefit of the list, here is a restatement of a couple of >>>>> questions raised during the call. >>>>> >>>>> 1.Since we are a bit confused about deadlines and the status of >>>>> issues on the existing list, would it be possible to extend the >>>>> deadline for raising issues, which seems to be today, until Friday? >>>>> >>>>> 2.Would it be possible to send a simple and complete list of the >>>>> relevant upcoming deadlines, as they currently stand, to the >>>>> list? Some of us seem to have missed or become confused about >>>>> some nuances here. >>>>> >>>>> Perhaps a simple restatement would help us spend less time on the >>>>> process questions. Thanks. >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 19:12:42 UTC