W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2013

RE: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection

From: Shane M Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:05:35 +0000
To: "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>, "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-ID: <DCCF036E573F0142BD90964789F720E3141D6C8A@GQ1-MB01-02.y.corp.yahoo.com>

Will the Co-Chairs and W3C Staff be sharing the official position on how best to move forward post the poll results review?  On Oct 16th I asked how long we should expect for this to occur and the response at that time was about 2 weeks.  With that in mind, it's my expectation we'll learn this at next week's meeting.  Is that a fair expectation?

Thank you,
- Shane

-----Original Message-----
From: Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation) [mailto:mts-std@schunter.org] 
Sent: Friday, October 25, 2013 9:46 AM
To: public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)
Subject: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection

Hi Team,

for preparation of next week's call, I would like to assemble a shortlist of proposals that we use for the call for objections:

I took the liberty and added the text discussed in last week's telco (revised Proposal 1) as a first initial candidate since I perceived support from several members of the group.

If you cannot live with any of the proposals currently shortlisted, please nominate an extra one to shortlist while explaining
     - What is the shortcoming of the currently shortlisted proposals
     - How does the newly added proposal mitigate this shortcoming

This will enable me to compile a list of (hopefully) less than 7 alternatives to then use as the set of alternatives on our call for objection.

Thanks a lot!

Received on Friday, 25 October 2013 17:08:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:40:00 UTC