tracking-ISSUE-216 (Contracts and Branding): Does ???Contractual relationships and branding??? provide an equal level of privacy controls as ???ownership and branding??? in the context of DNT? [Compliance Current] from Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker on 2013-10-01 (public-tracking@w3.org from October 2013)

From: Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 17:52:23 +0000
To: public-tracking@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1VR47T-0003yY-DC@stuart.w3.org>

tracking-ISSUE-216 (Contracts and Branding): Does “Contractual relationships and branding” provide an equal level of privacy controls as “ownership and branding” in the context of DNT? [Compliance Current]

http://www.w3.org/2011/tracking-protection/track/issues/216

Raised by: Alan Chapell
On product: Compliance Current

I believe that we have WG consensus that common ownership, control and branding provides sufficient transparency and privacy controls. Building on some of David Wainberg’s recent posts, I believe that branding and contractual provisions provide an equivalent level of transparency and control.

Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2013 17:52:24 UTC