W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2013

Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170)

From: David Wainberg <dwainberg@appnexus.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 09:14:33 -0400
Message-ID: <524ACAB9.4070500@appnexus.com>
To: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>
CC: <public-tracking@w3.org>

On 2013-10-01 9:07 AM, Walter van Holst wrote:
> On 2013-10-01 15:00, David Wainberg wrote:
>> Mike,
>> As the draft spec stands today, under DNT:1 third parties can collect
>> and use data with an exception or under the permitted uses. I don't
>> see the loophole. These exceptions are already agreed on.
> You are assuming that exceptions will always be granted. I rather 
> doubt that. As far as the permitted uses are concerned, I do not read 
> them as permitting to share DNT:1 data with third parties.
I'm not assuming that exceptions will always be granted. What does that 
have to do with it? And permitted uses will always be allowed.
> So Mike is right, this would create a glaring loophole, which would be 
> a no-no to me.
I still don't understand what the loophole is. Can you explain further?

Received on Tuesday, 1 October 2013 13:15:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:19 UTC