W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2013

Re: Issue 24 - Consensus

From: Walter van Holst <walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 21:41:37 +0200
Message-ID: <526977F1.5050509@xs4all.nl>
To: public-tracking@w3.org
On 24/10/2013 20:59, Shane M Wiley wrote:
> David,
> The initial language already provides for that perspective (paragraph
> 1).  We already call out the concepts of data minimization (don't
> collect/retain all data all the time) and data proportionality for
> all Permitted Uses.  The additional language I'm asking to be removed
> is wasteful in that context, overemphasizes a dimension of
> minimization that won't be used much in reality, and is redundant to
> the concepts already asked to be employed for all Permitted Uses, and
> unneedfully makes the document longer and more difficult to read.


I am happy to drop the language on graduated response provided that the
principle of data proportionality applies under *all* circumstances,
including DNT:0 and DNT:unset.


Received on Thursday, 24 October 2013 19:42:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 3 November 2017 21:45:19 UTC