Re: Please Re-Open Issue-47

I'd also like to see this issue/idea re-opened and explored thoroughly by the working group.  Given the new context since the poll, I think this idea allows for a nice compliment to the TPE-only or TPE-first effort.

Thanks,

Chris


Chris Mejia | Digital Supply Chain Solutions | Ad Technology Group | Interactive Advertising Bureau - IAB | chris.mejia@iab.net


From: Shane Wiley - Yahoo! <wileys@yahoo-inc.com<mailto:wileys@yahoo-inc.com>>
Date: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 11:44 AM
To: W3C DNT Working Group Mailing List <public-tracking@w3.org<mailto:public-tracking@w3.org>>
Subject: Please Re-Open Issue-47

TPWG Co-Chairs,

I respectfully request we reopen Issue-47 due to change in course for the Working Group.  We have a place in the TPE to allow a Server to respond with further information about their compliance with DNT in human readable form (well-known URI location) which allowed this issue to be originally closed.  I believe we now need a more structured method to indicate a specific compliance regime that a Server is supporting and I’m not sure the current link approach provides enough structure.

This could be a net new issue but some of that conversation was contained around this issue but basically at TPE field/well-known URI location that designates the compliance regime would fit this need (name of compliance standard, link to definitions, link to deeper details).  This would allow the browser to communicate to users the compliance regime in a more stable fashion (for example, this site supports DAA Compliance requirements).

- Shane