W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > October 2013

Re: Additional documentation for Issue-233

From: Nicholas Doty <npdoty@w3.org>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 18:51:03 -0700
Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org (public-tracking@w3.org)" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Message-Id: <84AF0856-07F2-449B-822D-631650090C6C@w3.org>
To: Jack Hobaugh <jack@networkadvertising.org>, Heather West <heatherwest@google.com>
I believe these may be editorial suggestions. The proporationate typo has been fixed in a previous round of corrections. Editors, do you want to make a determination on whether "minimized" would in fact work in this section in place of "limited"? I suggest we don't need to maintain a separate issue for this question.

I've added this email to the editorial list: http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Editorial_corrections


On October 16, 2013, at 5:59 PM, Jack Hobaugh <jack@networkadvertising.org> wrote:

> Issue-233
> Normative:
> Data retained by a party for permitted uses MUST be [replace "limited" with minimized] to the data reasonably necessary for such permitted uses.  Such data MUST NOT be retained any longer than is [replace proporationate with proportionate] and reasonably necessary for such permitted uses.
> Justification:
> The term “limit” suggests a hard boundary whereas “minimize” suggests a more flexible boundary that can be lowered as appropriate to provide privacy gains.
> In other words these terms operate in different directions.  Limit is a cap and minimize provides pressure to decrease, which is better for privacy gains.
> -- 
> Jack L. Hobaugh Jr
> Network Advertising Initiative | Counsel & Senior Director of Technology 
> 1634 Eye St. NW, Suite 750 Washington, DC 20006
> P: 202-347-5341 | jack@networkadvertising.org

Received on Sunday, 20 October 2013 01:51:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:40:00 UTC