public-tracking@w3.org from October 2013 by author

Alan Chapell

• Re: Plan moving forward (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Issue 5: Is this in the wiki? (Tuesday, 22 October)
• Re: Change Proposals: Issue 10 (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: Change Proposals: Issue 10 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Change Proposals: Issue 10 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-5 ­ Definition of Tracking (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-5 ­ Definition of Tracking (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Change proposal for ISSUE-5 ­ Definition of Tracking (Tuesday, 1 October)

Brad Kulick

• Re: Discussion of Issue-5 (definition of tracking), and a new CP (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: Clarifying end of poll timing (Monday, 7 October)
• Clarifying end of poll timing (Monday, 7 October)

Carl Cargill

• Plan moving forward (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Agenda for tomorrow (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Issue 24 - Consensus (Wednesday, 23 October)
• RE: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• RE: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• RE: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• RE: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• RE: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Tuesday, 15 October)
• TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Monday, 14 October)
• Non-editorial change, issue 5 (Wednesday, 2 October)

Chris Mejia

• Re: Please Re-Open Issue-47 (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Plan moving forward (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: ISSUE-10 proposed text for discussion (Wednesday, 30 October)

Chris Pedigo

• RE: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft (Thursday, 3 October)

David Singer

• Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Agenda for tomorrow, Issue-5 input, and regrets (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Agenda for tomorrow (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Re: Issue 24 - Consensus (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: Thinking Ahead - Thanksgiving Week (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Saturday, 12 October)
• Issue-5, trying to find a middle ground (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: issue-24 proposal 2 (Wednesday, 9 October)
• issue-24 proposal 2 (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: Discussion of Issue-5 (definition of tracking), and a new CP (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: Discussion of Issue-5 (definition of tracking), and a new CP (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Discussion of Issue-5 (definition of tracking), and a new CP (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (Monday, 7 October)
• Re: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft (Monday, 7 October)

David Wainberg

• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Change proposal ISSUE-234 (Thursday, 17 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions (Wednesday, 9 October)
• regrets for tomorrow's call (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions (Tuesday, 8 October)
• New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text (Monday, 7 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-222 (personalization): Personalization or customizing of content should be allowed under certain collection/use limitations [Compliance Current] (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. (Wednesday, 2 October)
• open issues against current draft (Wednesday, 2 October)
• ISSUE-208: attach to current draft (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (Tuesday, 1 October)

Dobbs, Brooks

• Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (Tuesday, 1 October)

Geoff Gieron - AdTruth

• Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting (Tuesday, 1 October)

Israel, Susan

• RE: change proposal to issue-25 (Monday, 7 October)
• RE: text edits related to "raised" issues (Monday, 7 October)
• Re-opening an issue (Monday, 7 October)
• editorial change (Monday, 7 October)
• RE: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft (Thursday, 3 October)
• RE: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. (Wednesday, 2 October)
• deadlines (Wednesday, 2 October)
• RE: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 (Tuesday, 1 October)
• RE: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 (Tuesday, 1 October)

Jack Hobaugh

• Additional documentation for Issue-237 (Thursday, 17 October)
• Additional documentation for Issue-232 (Thursday, 17 October)
• Additional documentation for Issue-236 (Thursday, 17 October)
• Additional documentation for Issue-235 (Thursday, 17 October)
• Additional documentation for Issue-234 (Thursday, 17 October)
• Additional documentation for Issue-233 (Thursday, 17 October)
• Additional documentation for Issue-231 (Thursday, 17 October)
• Additional documentation for Issue-230 (Thursday, 17 October)
• Additional documentation for Issue-229 (Thursday, 17 October)
• Additional documentation for Issue-228 (Thursday, 17 October)
• Additional documentation for Issue-227 (Thursday, 17 October)

Jack L. Hobaugh Jr

• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Additional documentation for Issue-227 (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (Monday, 7 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V03) (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. (Wednesday, 2 October)

JC Cannon

• RE: Issue-5 Proposal-7 (Wednesday, 30 October)

Jeff Jaffe

• Re: My comments, as promised during the call (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)

Jeffrey Chester

• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: Change Proposals: Issue 10 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: change proposal to issue-25 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: change proposal to issue-25 (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-222 (personalization): Personalization or customizing of content should be allowed under certain collection/use limitations [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Issue:? Fingerprinting (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 (Tuesday, 1 October)

John Simpson

• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Issue 24 - Consensus (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Apologies.. (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Thursday, 10 October)
• Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: Change Proposals: Issue 10 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: change proposal to issue-25 (Monday, 7 October)
• Re: Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text (Monday, 7 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: Non-editorial change, issue 5 (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: Non-editorial change, issue 5 (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: change proposal to issue-25 (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: change proposal to issue-25 (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: Non-editorial change, issue 5 (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: New Change Proposal: Clarification of Compliance to User Choice (Issue-205) (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (Tuesday, 1 October)

Joseph Lorenzo Hall

• Re: Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting (Tuesday, 1 October)

Justin Brookman

• Re: Thinking Ahead - Thanksgiving Week (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• ISSUE-10: Discoverability (Thursday, 24 October)
• Agenda 10.23.13 (Monday, 21 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: New Change Proposal for Issue-10: remove party definitions (Tuesday, 8 October)
• Re: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-228 (Network Interaction): Revise the Network Interaction definition [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: Change proposal for ISSUE-5 ­ Definition of Tracking (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 (Tuesday, 1 October)

Kathy Joe

• ISSUE-25 proposed changes (Thursday, 17 October)
• ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (Friday, 4 October)
• ISSUE-25: Audience measurement research (Thursday, 3 October)
• ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (Wednesday, 2 October)

Lee Tien

• Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: NSA using Doubleclick for identifying Tor users (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (Tuesday, 1 October)

Marc Groman

• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)

Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)

• Re: Agenda for tomorrow, Issue-5 input, and regrets (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Agenda for tomorrow, Issue-5 input, and regrets (Wednesday, 30 October)
• ISSUE-10 proposed text for discussion (Wednesday, 30 October)
• fyi: EU participants: Telco may be 1h earlier this week (Tuesday, 29 October)
• Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Thursday, 10 October)
• TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V01) (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Poll closes tonight! (Wednesday, 9 October)
• ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (Tuesday, 8 October)
• TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V04) (Monday, 7 October)
• 45 issues to go + On the Status of ISSUEs (Raised, Open, Pending Review) (Monday, 7 October)
• Re: Re-opening an issue (Monday, 7 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Friday, 4 October)
• TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V03) (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. (Wednesday, 2 October)
• TPWG Agenda for the October 09 call (V02) (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Note: Deadlines for individual ISSUEs are announced as part of the agenda (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Deadline for raising issues extended to October 06. (Wednesday, 2 October)
• List of ISSUEs on our radar (attached to the Compliance-Current product) (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Agenda for the October 02 call (V01) (Tuesday, 1 October)

Matthias Schunter (Intel)

• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Friday, 11 October)

Mike O'Neill

• RE: Issue-5 Proposal-7 (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Issue-5 Proposal-7 (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: ISSUE-10 proposed text for discussion (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: EU participants: Telco may be 1h earlier this week (Tuesday, 29 October)
• RE: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Tuesday, 15 October)
• RE: Issue-5, trying to find a middle ground (Saturday, 12 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Friday, 11 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Friday, 11 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Thursday, 10 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Wednesday, 9 October)
• RE: Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• RE: Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Tuesday, 8 October)
• RE: Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Friday, 4 October)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Friday, 4 October)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Friday, 4 October)
• RE: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft (Thursday, 3 October)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Thursday, 3 October)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Thursday, 3 October)
• Change proposal First Party Compliance issue-170 (Wednesday, 2 October)
• change proposal to issue-25 (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 (Wednesday, 2 October)
• RE: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (Tuesday, 1 October)
• RE: Issue:? Fingerprinting (Tuesday, 1 October)
• RE: Issue:? Fingerprinting (Tuesday, 1 October)
• RE: Reminder: Deadline for raising issues is October 02 (this Wednesday) issue-205, issue-189 (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Audience measurement permitted use issue-25 (Tuesday, 1 October)
• RE: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (Tuesday, 1 October)
• RE: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (Tuesday, 1 October)

Mike Zaneis

• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• RE: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Tuesday, 15 October)

mts-std@schunter.org

• Re: Agenda 10.23.13 - Input on ISSUE-5 (Wednesday, 23 October)

Nicholas Doty

• Re: Additional documentation for Issue-236 (Sunday, 20 October)
• Re: Additional documentation for Issue-235 (Sunday, 20 October)
• Re: Additional documentation for Issue-234 (Sunday, 20 October)
• Re: Change proposal re: DNT: 0 (Sunday, 20 October)
• Re: Additional documentation for Issue-233 (Sunday, 20 October)
• Re: Additional documentation for Issue-231 (Sunday, 20 October)
• Re: Additional documentation for Issue-230 (Sunday, 20 October)
• Re: Additional documentation for Issue-229 (Sunday, 20 October)
• Re: Additional documentation for Issue-228 (Sunday, 20 October)
• Re: Additional documentation for Issue-227 (Sunday, 20 October)
• tracking our change proposals (Sunday, 20 October)
• Re: Change Proposals: Issue 10 (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: Discussion of Issue-5 (definition of tracking), and a new CP (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: Non-editorial change, issue 5 (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: ISSUE-208: attach to current draft (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: Compliance document updates for review before next WD publication (was CVS WWW/2011/tracking-protection/drafts) (Tuesday, 1 October)

Ninja Marnau

• Re: Apologies.. (Wednesday, 23 October)

Rigo Wenning

• Re: ISSUE-25: Audience measurement research (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: wrong definition of tracking in TCS (Tuesday, 1 October)

Rob Sherman

• Editorial Change - ISSUE-25 Proposed Text (Monday, 7 October)
• Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (Monday, 7 October)
• Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (Monday, 7 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: ISSUE-25 on the agenda for the October 02 call (Thursday, 3 October)

Rob van Eijk

• Re: Issue-5 Proposal-7 (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: Issue-5 Proposal-7 (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Issue-5 Proposal-7 (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Plan moving forward (Wednesday, 30 October)

Roy T. Fielding

• Re: Issue-5 Proposal-7 (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Issue-5 Proposal-7 (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Friday, 18 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Tuesday, 15 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Friday, 11 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: issue-24 proposal 2 (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: Discussion of Issue-5 (definition of tracking), and a new CP (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Wednesday, 9 October)
• Re: Non-editorial change, issue 5 (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: Non-editorial change, issue 5 (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: ISSUE-208: attach to current draft (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: wrong definition of tracking in TCS (Tuesday, 1 October)

Shane M Wiley

• RE: Please Re-Open Issue-47 (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Please Re-Open Issue-47 (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (Wednesday, 30 October)
• RE: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• RE: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• RE: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• RE: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• RE: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• RE: Issue 24 - Consensus (Thursday, 24 October)
• RE: Issue 24 - Consensus (Thursday, 24 October)
• RE: Issue 24 - Consensus (Thursday, 24 October)
• Thinking Ahead - Thanksgiving Week (Wednesday, 23 October)
• RE: Issue 24 - Consensus (Wednesday, 23 October)
• RE: Issue 24 - Consensus (Wednesday, 23 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Wednesday, 16 October)
• RE: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Wednesday, 16 October)
• RE: Discussion of Issue-5 (definition of tracking), and a new CP (Tuesday, 8 October)
• RE: Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Tuesday, 8 October)
• RE: Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 (Tuesday, 8 October)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Monday, 7 October)
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Monday, 7 October)
• RE: change proposal to issue-25 (Monday, 7 October)
• RE: change proposal to issue-25 (Monday, 7 October)
• RE: Further text associated with the change proposal on Unique Identifiers, issue-199 (Monday, 7 October)

SULLIVAN, BRYAN L

• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)
• New Change Proposal: Clarification of Compliance to User Choice (Issue-205) (Wednesday, 2 October)

Thomas Schauf

• Re: TPWG Agenda for the October 16 call (V02) (Wednesday, 16 October)

Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker

• tracking-ISSUE-238 ( Permitted uses ): Scope of Permitted uses (Monday, 7 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-237 (Financial Logging): Revise Financial Logging section [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-236 (Frequency Capping): Adjust Frequency Capping section [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-235 (Reasonable Security): Adjust Reasonable Security section [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-234 (No Personalization): Remove "No Personalization" section [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-233 (Data Minimization): Data Minimization, Retention and Transparency [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-232 (Permitted Uses: Transparency): Permitted Uses: Transparency [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-231 (Permitted Uses): General Principles for Permitted Uses [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-230 (New Definition): Add a definition for "Web Browsing History" [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-229 (Party Definition): Adjustment to Party definition [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-228 (Network Interaction): Revise the Network Interaction definition [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-227 (User Agent Minimum Requirements): User Agent Minimum Requirements [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-226 (Rules by context): What rules apply for data collection/use, by context [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-225 (Clarification of Compliance to User Choice in TPE): Clarification of Compliance to User Choice in TPE [Tracking Preference Expression (DNT)] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-224 (Clarification of Compliance to User Choice): Clarification of Compliance to User Choice (Issue-205) [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-223 (implementation criteria): Define criteria now for the test/implementation phase of the compliance spec [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-222 (personalization): Personalization or customizing of content should be allowed under certain collection/use limitations [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-221 (Context): Define collection and use by context rather than party (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-220 (Proportionality): Proportionality should be across the board [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-218: Data that is out of scope [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-217: Terminology for user action, interaction, and network interaction [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• tracking-ISSUE-216 (Contracts and Branding): Does â??Contractual relationships and brandingâ?? provide an equal level of privacy controls as â??ownership and brandingâ?? in the context of DNT? [Compliance Current] (Tuesday, 1 October)

Vinay Goel

• Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (Thursday, 31 October)
• Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Friday, 11 October)
• Another possible change that needs to be reverted from the Editor's Draft (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: change proposal to issue-25 (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (Tuesday, 1 October)

Walter van Holst

• Re: Consolidated Proposal for Definition of Collect (Wednesday, 30 October)
• Re: Selecting a subset of texts for preparing ISSUE-5 for a call for objection (Friday, 25 October)
• Re: Issue 24 - Consensus (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: Issue 24 - Consensus (Thursday, 24 October)
• Re: Issue 24 - Consensus (Wednesday, 23 October)
• Re: Apologies.. (Wednesday, 23 October)
• My comments, as promised during the call (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Wednesday, 16 October)
• Re: ISSUE-5: Consensus definition of "tracking" for the intro? (Friday, 11 October)
• NSA using Doubleclick for identifying Tor users (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-222 (personalization): Personalization or customizing of content should be allowed under certain collection/use limitations [Compliance Current] (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Friday, 4 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Thursday, 3 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-219 (Context separation): 3rd parties that are 1st parties must not use data across these contexts [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-222 (personalization): Personalization or customizing of content should be allowed under certain collection/use limitations [Compliance Current] (Wednesday, 2 October)
• Re: Issue:? Fingerprinting (Tuesday, 1 October)
• Re: New Change Proposal: New text for First Party Compliance (Issue-170) (Tuesday, 1 October)

Wendy Seltzer

• Your input on the way forward (Tuesday, 8 October)

イアンフェッティ

• Re: Plan moving forward (Tuesday, 29 October)

Last message date: Thursday, 31 October 2013 17:07:56 UTC