w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from April to June 2001 by author

Adam Victor Reed

• Re: Revising 2.4 - last post before f2f (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Revising 2.4 (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Skip Nav Ideas (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Updating 2.4, re-revised (Thursday, 31 May)
• Updating 2.4, re-revised (Thursday, 31 May)
• Updating 2.4, rewritten (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: shockwave on NT was Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Revising 2.4, cont. (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Revising 2.4 (revised) (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Including content modes in 4.1 (Saturday, 19 May)
• Against zero-sum games (Sunday, 13 May)
• Attention deficits (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: What is illustrated (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: alt to text (Friday, 4 May)
• What is illustrated (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: alt to text (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: alt to text (Thursday, 3 May)
• alt to text (Wednesday, 2 May)
• alt for icons (Wednesday, 2 May)
• "CC/PP" (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Content negotiation (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Content negotiation (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: URGENT reply requested: next f2f (Sunday, 22 April)
• RFD: Checkpoint 1.? Enable optional suppression of disabling content (Thursday, 19 April)
• Hebrew vowel marks - yes, they ARE in Unicode (Thursday, 19 April)
• Implementing vowel marks (Wednesday, 18 April)
• Accessibility with attention deficit (Saturday, 14 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Thursday, 12 April)

Al Gilman

• Re: Left click (and fine motor instability) (Wednesday, 16 May)
• security cookie in image (Saturday, 12 May)
• RE: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: alt for icons (Wednesday, 2 May)
• RE: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question (Wednesday, 25 April)
• multimodal content for cognitive effectiveness (Sunday, 22 April)
• RE: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question (Sunday, 22 April)
• Re: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, & triggering mechanisms (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Thursday, 12 April)

Alan J. Flavell

• Re: cross posted form IG (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: cross posted form IG (Sunday, 6 May)
• Re: What is illustrated (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: alt to text (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: alt to text (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: alt for icons (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: alt for icons (Wednesday, 2 May)
• RE: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Saturday, 21 April)

Andi Snow-Weaver

• WCAG Meeting Minutes, June 01, 2001 (Thursday, 31 May)
• minute taker for today's call?? (Thursday, 31 May)
• Probable regrets for April 12 call (Wednesday, 11 April)

Anne Pemberton

• Re: photos of the meeting (Saturday, 30 June)
• Re: photos of the meeting (Friday, 29 June)
• Illustrations for Guideline 3 (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Semantic pragmatic (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: Semantic pragmatic (Tuesday, 26 June)
• RE: Revising 2.4 (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording (Sunday, 10 June)
• RE: Skip Nav Ideas (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Reading effectiveness level - SMOG (Saturday, 2 June)
• Re: Updating 2.4, re-revised (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: Updating 2.4, rewritten (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Updating 2.4, rewritten (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Revising 2.4, cont. (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers (Wednesday, 23 May)
• RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: shockwave on NT was Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Revising 2.4, cont. (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: shockwave on NT was Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Tuesday, 22 May)
• RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Tuesday, 22 May)
• RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: words (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: More on checkpoint 1.1 (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: the meaning of the term document in WCAG2 (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: Including content modes in 4.1 (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1 (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: Natural Associations [was Re: Illustration] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: oops was Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Against zero-sum games (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Against zero-sum games (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: Checkpoint copy proposal: 3.3 (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• Out of Box Thinking (Friday, 11 May)
• RE: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• RE: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: FW: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: HCI International 2001 (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Illustrating Guidelines (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: alt to text (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: alt to text (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: alt to text (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: alt to text (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: alt to text (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: alt to text (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: alt to text (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: Kudos for intro (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: alt for icons (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: alt to text (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: alt for icons (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: alt for icons (Wednesday, 2 May)
• RE: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: Kudos for intro (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability? (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability? (was Re: 4/26 WCAG meeting minutes) (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: 4/26 WCAG meeting minutes (Friday, 27 April)
• Web page development (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Government was Re: safety, accessibility and cars (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Sample Web Page (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: FW: Maximize Web Site Usability (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Compliance ratings (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Content negotiation (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Green Fingers (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: Green Fingers (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: Green Fingers (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: Green Fingers (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: Green Fingers (Monday, 23 April)
• RE: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: Green Fingers was Re: COPUS was Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Sunday, 22 April)
• RE: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Saturday, 21 April)
• Sample of ideal page (Saturday, 21 April)
• Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Saturday, 21 April)
• Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Saturday, 21 April)
• Re: COPUS was Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Saturday, 21 April)
• Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Saturday, 21 April)
• RE: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Saturday, 21 April)
• Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: anne's first G3 mockup (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: anne's first G3 mockup (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: anne's first G3 mockup (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: 4/19 meeting notes (Friday, 20 April)
• Illustrated Version (Sunday, 15 April)
• RE: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 13 April)
• RE: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: Tv, radio, newspapers, books and the need for a visual style. (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: Tv, radio, newspapers, books and the need for a visual style. (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Illustrations (was Re: Meeting agenda) (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Meeting agenda (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Meeting agenda (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Meeting agenda (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Meeting agenda (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Tuesday, 3 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Monday, 2 April)
• Re: 28 March 2001 working draft (Monday, 2 April)
• RE: New Guideline proposal (Monday, 2 April)

Annuska Perkins

• RE: Agenda (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face (Tuesday, 8 May)
• regrets (Thursday, 26 April)
• RE: Green Fingers (Tuesday, 24 April)
• regrets for April 12 call (Wednesday, 11 April)

Antti Raike

• VS: Tunnel vision, cinemasense and guidelines (Saturday, 30 June)

asgilman@iamdigex.net

• Re: Access-Israel URL (Saturday, 21 April)

Bailey, Bruce

• RE: Skip Nav Ideas (Monday, 4 June)
• RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Tuesday, 22 May)
• RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Tuesday, 22 May)
• RE: Policy use (Friday, 11 May)
• RE: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• RE: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• RE: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• FW: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: indenting in a table (Monday, 7 May)
• RE: What is illustrated (Monday, 7 May)
• RE: Sources and conferences related to cognitive and learning dis abilities (Thursday, 26 April)
• RE: Sources and conferences related to cognitive and learning d isabilities (Wednesday, 25 April)
• RE: Green Fingers (Monday, 23 April)
• Browse button on forms (Friday, 20 April)
• RE: New Guideline proposal (Monday, 2 April)

by way of Wendy A Chisholm

• Test Case for grouping of Links and whitespace (Tuesday, 15 May)
• HCI International 2001 (Wednesday, 9 May)
• RE: ALT with INPUT (Wednesday, 9 May)
• accesskeys (www.w3.org/WAI/GL/tests/accesskey1.html) (Saturday, 21 April)
• Notes on verifiability of checkpoints (Thursday, 12 April)

Catherine Laws

• Re: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, & triggering mechanisms (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, & triggering mechanisms (Friday, 20 April)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: photos of the meeting (Saturday, 30 June)
• photos of the meeting (Friday, 29 June)
• Re: Semantic pragmatic (Friday, 29 June)
• Re: Comments on WCAG2.0 Working Draft (Thursday, 28 June)
• Re: phones (Thursday, 21 June)
• notes from first f2f breakout on graphics (Thursday, 21 June)
• Re: Meta Refresh (was Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording) (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: Meta Refresh (was Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording) (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: Meta Refresh (was Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording) (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Updating 2.4, re-revised (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: Updating 2.4, re-revised (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: Updating 2.4, rewritten (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Agenda for face to face meeting (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Updating 2.4, rewritten (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Merging WCAG With EARL (Tuesday, 29 May)
• Re: Revising 2.4 (revised) (Saturday, 26 May)
• Re: the meaning of the term document in WCAG2 (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: Including content modes in 4.1 (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: [resolved?] RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1 (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1 (Friday, 18 May)
• Re: Natural Associations [was Re: Illustration] (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Agenda (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: oops was Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: oops was Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal (Monday, 14 May)
• Illustration - checkpoint proposal (Monday, 14 May)
• off topic RE: Policy use (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• Policy use, was RE: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: on measures of reading level (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: alt for icons (Wednesday, 2 May)
• RE: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? TRIAL (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: alt for icons (Wednesday, 2 May)
• WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability? (Tuesday, 1 May)
• RE: Sources and conferences related to cognitive and learning dis abilities (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability? (Sunday, 29 April)
• RE: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Monday, 23 April)
• RE: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: Suggestion to split the list (Sunday, 22 April)
• Re: URGENT reply requested: next f2f (Sunday, 22 April)
• Re: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 13 April)
• RE: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: Illustrations (was Re: Meeting agenda) (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Meeting agenda (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Lynx & what type of document do we want? (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Meeting agenda (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Accessibility of ALT texts (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: Accessibility of ALT texts (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Wednesday, 4 April)
• RE: New Guideline proposal (Tuesday, 3 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Tuesday, 3 April)
• Re: 28 March 2001 working draft (Monday, 2 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Monday, 2 April)

Chiarito-Mazzarella,Jay

• RE: Revising 2.4 - last post before f2f (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Revising 2.4 - last post before f2f (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Skip Nav Ideas (Monday, 4 June)

Chris Lilley

• Re: Semantic pragmatic (Tuesday, 26 June)

Chris Ridpath

• Re: photos of the meeting (Friday, 29 June)

cyns@opendesign.com

• RE: Server-side techniques? (Friday, 29 June)
• regrets for today's call (Thursday, 14 June)
• belated regrets for today's call (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: Introduction (Thursday, 17 May)
• UTF-8 RFC (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: PDF Techniques Help Please (Thursday, 17 May)
• regrets for Thursday's call (Thursday, 3 May)

Cynthia Shelly

• RE: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Friday, 20 April)

Cynthia Waddell

• Len Kasday University Obituary (Thursday, 24 May)

Daniel Dardailler

• Re: Semantic pragmatic (Wednesday, 27 June)
• EARL 0.9 Release (Thursday, 26 April)

David Sloan

• Request to Join (Friday, 22 June)
• Proposal for usability testing of WCAG (Tuesday, 19 June)

DPawson@rnib.org.uk

• RE: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Wednesday, 2 May)
• RE: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Tuesday, 1 May)

Emmanuelle Gutiérrez y Restrepo

• RE: words (Monday, 21 May)
• RE: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Tuesday, 1 May)
• RE: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 13 April)
• RE: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 13 April)
• RE: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 13 April)
• RE: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 13 April)

Gregg Vanderheiden

• RE: Revising 2.4 (Monday, 11 June)
• RE: Proposal: 2.4 rewording (Monday, 11 June)
• RE: Proposal: 2.4 rewording (Monday, 11 June)
• RE: Reason Revisited (Monday, 11 June)
• RE: Updating 2.4, re-revised (Thursday, 31 May)
• RE: Updating 2.4, rewritten (Sunday, 27 May)
• FW: Usability.gov (Friday, 25 May)
• RE: [resolved?] RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1 (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: [resolved?] RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1 (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1 (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: Introduction (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1 (Thursday, 17 May)
• FW: Maximize Web Site Usability (Tuesday, 24 April)

gregory j. rosmaita

• RE: Skip Nav Ideas (Tuesday, 5 June)
• RE: Skip Nav Ideas (resend with valid attachment) (Tuesday, 5 June)
• RE: Skip Nav Ideas (Tuesday, 5 June)
• RE: Skip Nav Ideas (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Skip Nav Ideas (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: summary of new issues from this week's list discussions (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Silence (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: the meaning of the term document in WCAG2 (Sunday, 20 May)
• the meaning of the term document in WCAG2 (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1 (Friday, 18 May)
• natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1 (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: Against zero-sum games (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Against zero-sum games (Sunday, 13 May)
• conditional versus optional content (thread from UA list) (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face (Tuesday, 8 May)
• can accessibility be distinguished from usability? (was Re: 4/26 WCAG meeting minutes) (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, & triggering mechanisms (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: URGENT reply requested: next f2f (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: anne's first G3 mockup (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, & triggering mechanisms (Friday, 20 April)
• RE: Accessibility of ALT texts (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: Extensive forms (Friday, 20 April)
• INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, & triggering mechanisms (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: Ruby as vowel marking mechanism? (was Re: Implementing vowel marks) (Friday, 20 April)
• anne's first G3 mockup (Friday, 20 April)
• Ruby as vowel marking mechanism? (was Re: Implementing vowel marks) (Friday, 20 April)
• Access-Israel (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: Accessibility of ALT texts (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: Accessibility of ALT texts (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: Accesskey does not work on my OS (Wednesday, 11 April)

Harvey Bingham

• WAI Glossary comparison with ANSI "standard definitions" (Monday, 21 May)

Ian Jacobs

• Re: RFD: Checkpoint 1.? Enable optional suppression of disabling content (Thursday, 19 April)

Jan Richards

• Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Tuesday, 1 May)

Jason White

• WCAG meeting arrangements (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Agenda (Thursday, 14 June)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Agenda for face to face meeting (Thursday, 31 May)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 30 May)
• Re: Updating 2.4, rewritten (Sunday, 27 May)
• Re: Comments on PDF Techniques doc (Thursday, 17 May)
• Agenda (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Introduction (Friday, 11 May)
• Agenda (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: on measures of reading level (Sunday, 6 May)
• Agenda (Thursday, 3 May)
• Agenda (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Compliance ratings (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Hebrew vowel marks - yes, they ARE in Unicode (Friday, 20 April)
• Agenda (Thursday, 19 April)
• The problem of verification in WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 12 April)
• Meeting agenda (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Meeting postponed (Wednesday, 4 April)

Jenae Andershonis

• Checkpoint 11.4 (Tuesday, 22 May)

Jim Allan

• RE: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question (Wednesday, 25 April)
• RE: Accessibility of ALT texts (Wednesday, 11 April)

Jim Thatcher

• RE: Skip Nav Ideas (Tuesday, 5 June)
• FW: Extensive forms (Monday, 21 May)
• RE: Extensive forms (Sunday, 6 May)
• RE: skipnav (Sunday, 6 May)
• RE: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question (Monday, 23 April)
• RE: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, (Monday, 23 April)

Joel Sanda

• Request to Join (Monday, 16 April)

Jon Gunderson

• RE: Accessibility of ALT texts (Monday, 23 April)

Jonathan Chetwynd

• Re: photos of the meeting (Saturday, 30 June)
• sound was Re: "Complex illustrations do not express many ideas with the same clarity as complex text." (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: shockwave on NT was Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: shockwave on NT was Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• "Complex illustrations do not express many ideas with the same clarity as complex text." (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: shockwave on NT was Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Left click (and fine motor instability) (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Left click (and fine motor instability) (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Left click (Wednesday, 16 May)
• oops was Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal (Tuesday, 15 May)
• the train that comes out of the screen makes most people duck even on first site of the medium (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: URGENT reply requested: next f2f (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: on measures of reading level (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: Sources and conferences related to cognitive and learning disabilities (Sunday, 29 April)
• Government was Re: safety, accessibility and cars (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: safety, accessibility and cars (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Of course cost is relevant (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Compliance ratings (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Green Fingers (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: Green Fingers (Monday, 23 April)
• Another gardening site produced by LDD students with help from staff (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: Green Fingers was Re: COPUS was Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: URGENT reply requested: next f2f (Sunday, 22 April)
• Green Fingers was Re: COPUS was Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Saturday, 21 April)
• COPUS was Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Saturday, 21 April)
• Re: french dinners & affordance? (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: Tv, radio, newspapers, books and the need for a visual style. (Friday, 13 April)
• Tv, radio, newspapers, books and the need for a visual style. (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Lynx & what type of document do we want? (Thursday, 12 April)
• Zoo & themes was Re: what type of document do we want? (Sunday, 8 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Saturday, 7 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Saturday, 7 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Saturday, 7 April)

Judy Brewer

• RE: Skip Nav Ideas (Tuesday, 5 June)

Katie Haritos-Shea

• HTML - WCAG Meeting Minutes, June 7, 2001 (Sunday, 10 June)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 7 June)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 7 June)
• RE: Intro Re-do (Wednesday, 6 June)
• RE: Intro Re-do Suggestions (Wednesday, 6 June)
• Intro Re-do (Tuesday, 5 June)
• RE: Skip Nav Ideas (Tuesday, 5 June)
• RE: Skip Nav Ideas (Monday, 4 June)
• Skip Nav Ideas (Monday, 4 June)
• RE: Len's Legacy and Accessible Folder Tabs (Monday, 4 June)
• Len's Legacy Lives On................... (Monday, 4 June)
• FW: Len Kasday Offficial (Tuesday, 22 May)
• RE: Graphic Designers work (Monday, 21 May)
• wd: Memorial for Len Kasday (Monday, 21 May)
• Guideline 1.5 and "Document" added (Sunday, 20 May)
• [w3c-wai-gl] <none> (Sunday, 20 May)
• Silence (Sunday, 20 May)
• RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1 (Friday, 18 May)
• Intro Updated (Friday, 18 May)
• natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1 (Friday, 18 May)
• natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1 (Friday, 18 May)
• natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1 (Friday, 18 May)
• RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1 (Thursday, 17 May)
• Introduction to WCAG 2.0 (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• RE: URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face (Tuesday, 8 May)
• RE: skipnav (Sunday, 6 May)
• RE: skipnav (Sunday, 6 May)
• Resources for Best Web Colors for icons - considering the colorblind (Friday, 4 May)
• Minutes 03 May 2001 Ready (Friday, 4 May)
• Meeting Minutes 03 May 2001 (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? TRIAL (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability? (Friday, 27 April)
• Meeting Minutes 04-26-2001 (Friday, 27 April)
• Action Item: Jason & Katie; Simpler Language Alt (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Action Item: PDF Techniques, please review and comment (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Amsterdam (Friday, 20 April)
• Subject: Re: Hebrew vowel marks - yes, they ARE in Unicode (Friday, 20 April)
• Subject: good elevator pitch for Semantic Web (Friday, 20 April)
• PDF Techniques Help Please (Thursday, 19 April)
• PDF Techniques Help Please (Thursday, 19 April)
• RE: what type of document do we want? (Thursday, 12 April)
• FW: Re: what type of document do we want? (Tuesday, 10 April)
• FW: Re: what type of document do we want? (Tuesday, 10 April)

Kazuhiro Kitagawa

• Re: "CC/PP" (Wednesday, 25 April)

Kynn Bartlett

• Re: photos of the meeting (Sunday, 1 July)
• Re: Semantic pragmatic (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Re: Semantic pragmatic (Tuesday, 26 June)
• RE: Skip Nav Ideas (Tuesday, 5 June)
• RE: Skip Nav Ideas (Tuesday, 5 June)
• RE: Skip Nav Ideas (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: Skip Nav Ideas (Monday, 4 June)
• Re: URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: "CC/PP" (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Content negotiation (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Government (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Green Fingers (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Green Fingers (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Green Fingers (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: safety, accessibility and cars (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Green Fingers (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Content negotiation (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Compliance ratings (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Compliance ratings (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: 4/19 meeting notes (Thursday, 19 April)
• Re: Just what you wanted a new check piont (Tuesday, 17 April)
• Re: Accessibility of ALT texts (Tuesday, 10 April)
• The Comics/Web Connection (was: what type of document do we want?) (Monday, 9 April)

Lisa Seeman

• Re: Against zero-sum games (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• Belated Regrets (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Some more thoughts re 3.3 etc. (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Suggestion to split the list (Sunday, 22 April)
• Re: URGENT reply requested: next f2f (Sunday, 22 April)
• Re: accesskeys (www.w3.org/WAI/GL/tests/accesskey1.html) (Saturday, 21 April)
• Re: Hebrew vowel marks - yes, they ARE in Unicode (Saturday, 21 April)
• Re: Access-Israel (Saturday, 21 April)
• Re: Implementing vowel marks (Thursday, 19 April)
• Re:Hebrew is a BILI language most of it is right to left. Implementing vowel marks (Thursday, 19 April)
• Re: Just what you wanted a new check piont (Wednesday, 18 April)
• Just what you wanted a new check piont (Tuesday, 17 April)

Lois Wakeman

• Accessibility of ALT texts (Tuesday, 10 April)

Loretta Guarino Reid

• WCAG Meeting Minutes, June 7, 2001 (Friday, 8 June)
• Re: Comments on PDF Techniques doc (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face (Tuesday, 8 May)
• 4/26 WCAG meeting minutes (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: personal schedule until 7 May - need for scribes next 2 WCAG meetings (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Compliance ratings (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: URGENT reply requested: next f2f (Sunday, 22 April)
• Re: Ruby as vowel marking mechanism? (was Re: Implementing vowel marks) (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: Ruby as vowel marking mechanism? (was Re: Implementing vowel marks) (Friday, 20 April)
• regrets for April 12 (Friday, 6 April)

Marja-Riitta Koivunen

• Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability? (was Re: 4/26 WCAG meeting minutes) (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: Green Fingers (Monday, 23 April)

mark novak

• Re: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, & triggering mechanisms (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: INPUT TYPE="file", speech output, & triggering mechanisms (Friday, 20 April)

Marti

• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: alt to text (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: alt to text (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: alt to text (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: Illustrated Version (Sunday, 15 April)
• Illustrations (was Re: Meeting agenda) (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Meeting agenda (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Meeting agenda (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Meeting agenda (Thursday, 12 April)

Matt May

• Re: photos of the meeting (Friday, 29 June)
• Re: Semantic pragmatic (Tuesday, 26 June)
• Re: Revising 2.4 (Tuesday, 12 June)
• Re: Revising 2.4 (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Meta Refresh (was Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording) (Monday, 11 June)
• Proposal: 2.4 rewording (Sunday, 10 June)
• Re: Updating 2.4, re-revised (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers (Thursday, 24 May)
• Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Revising 2.4, cont. (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Saturday, 12 May)
• Checkpoint copy proposal: 3.3 (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: cross posted form IG (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: cross posted form IG (Sunday, 6 May)
• on measures of reading level (Friday, 4 May)
• Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Wednesday, 2 May)
• Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability? (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability? (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: 4/26 WCAG meeting minutes (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: Government (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Green Fingers (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: Green Fingers (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: Green Fingers (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: Green Fingers was Re: COPUS was Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Sunday, 22 April)
• Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Friday, 20 April)
• 4/19 meeting notes (Thursday, 19 April)

Mike Paciello

• RE: FYI: MacroMedia Releases DreamWeaver/UltraDev 508 Web Accessibility Extentensions (Wednesday, 9 May)

Neil Morris

• Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Request to Join (Wednesday, 16 May)

Paul Bohman

• Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Checkpoint copy proposal: 3.3 (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Introduction (Friday, 11 May)
• Introduction (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: URGENT reply requested: next f2f (Monday, 7 May)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 3 May)
• Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability? (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: Compliance ratings (Monday, 23 April)
• Compliance ratings (Monday, 23 April)
• Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Friday, 20 April)
• alternative content for cognitive disabilities (Friday, 20 April)

Robert Neff

• wendy? where are you <smile>? (Sunday, 6 May)
• skipnav (Sunday, 6 May)
• FW: indenting in a table (Sunday, 6 May)
• FW: Use relative sizing and positioning (Sunday, 6 May)
• cross posted form IG (Sunday, 6 May)

Scott Geiser

• Re: Technniques for Accessibility Evaluation and Repair - Technique 7.5.1 (Friday, 29 June)

Scott Luebking

• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Sunday, 13 May)

Sean B. Palmer

• Re: photos of the meeting (Saturday, 30 June)
• Merging WCAG With EARL (Monday, 28 May)
• Re: Natural Associations [was Re: Illustration] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Natural Associations [was Re: Illustration] (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)

seeman

• Semantic pragmatic (Friday, 29 June)
• Tunnel vision (Wednesday, 28 June)
• Re: Semantic pragmatic (Wednesday, 28 June)
• Semantic pragmatic (Wednesday, 28 June)

Slaydon, Eugenia

• RE: Extensive forms (Monday, 21 May)
• RE: Extensive forms (Thursday, 17 May)
• RE: Extensive forms (Monday, 7 May)
• RE: Extensive forms (Friday, 4 May)
• RE: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question (Friday, 4 May)
• RE: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question (Monday, 23 April)
• RE: Extensive forms & tables accessibility question (Friday, 20 April)
• Extensive forms & tables accessibility question (Friday, 20 April)

Sophie Wretenby

• Ang: Re: Comments on WCAG2.0 Working Draft (Friday, 29 June)
• Comments on WCAG2.0 Working Draft (Wednesday, 27 June)

Terry Bunter

• Request to Join (Tuesday, 19 June)

Thanasis Kinias

• Re: Semantic pragmatic (Saturday, 30 June)
• Re: Meta Refresh (was Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording) (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: Meta Refresh (was Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording) (Thursday, 14 June)
• Re: Revising 2.4 - last post before f2f (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: Meta Refresh (was Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording) (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Meta Refresh (was Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording) (Monday, 11 June)
• Re: Len's Legacy and Accessible Folder Tabs (Monday, 4 June)
• Accessible Folder Tabs (Monday, 4 June)

Wendy A Chisholm

• Server-side techniques? (Friday, 29 June)
• Next F2F meeting: 10/11 September 2001, Redmond, WA, USA (Friday, 29 June)
• Re: Illustrations for Guideline 3 (Wednesday, 27 June)
• Preliminary minutes from F2F (Wednesday, 27 June)
• 14 June 2001 WCAG WG telecon (Thursday, 14 June)
• Reading effectiveness level - SMOG (Saturday, 2 June)
• addresses for today's call (Thursday, 31 May)
• Re: Updating 2.4, re-revised (Thursday, 31 May)
• minute taker for today's call?? (Thursday, 31 May)
• thursday's meeting cancelled (Thursday, 24 May)
• summary of new issues from this week's list discussions (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: 1.1 revisited (Monday, 21 May)
• Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Monday, 21 May)
• [resolved?] RE: natural language checkpoint for WCAG2 GL1 (Friday, 18 May)
• Web Accessibility Tutorials in June (Friday, 18 May)
• URGENT: booking rooms in Amsterdam (Friday, 18 May)
• 17 May 2001 WCAG WG minutes (Thursday, 17 May)
• Hotels for June F2F (Thursday, 17 May)
• Re: Comments on PDF Techniques doc (Thursday, 17 May)
• Comments on PDF Techniques doc (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Agenda - PDF Techniques address (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Registration for the June F2F in Amsterdam is open until 8 June (Tuesday, 15 May)
• Re: Introduction, p.s. (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Introduction (Monday, 14 May)
• IE stand on window pop-ups (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• Meeting page for 20/21 June F2F (Friday, 11 May)
• 10 May 2001 WCAG WG minutes (Thursday, 10 May)
• Fwd: Assets 2002 - Call for Participation (Thursday, 10 May)
• URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Sources and conferences related to cognitive and learning disabilities (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: "CC/PP" (Wednesday, 25 April)
• personal schedule until 7 May - need for scribes next 2 WCAG meetings (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Etiquette and use of the wai-gl listserv (Tuesday, 24 April)
• URGENT reply requested: next f2f (Friday, 20 April)
• Re: 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Friday, 13 April)
• 12 April 2001 WCAG WG Minutes (Thursday, 12 April)

William Loughborough

• Re: Semantic pragmatic (Wednesday, 27 June)
• re: system requirements (Thursday, 21 June)
• phones (Thursday, 21 June)
• System Requirements (Thursday, 21 June)
• RE: Revising 2.4 - last post before f2f (Wednesday, 13 June)
• RE: Revising 2.4 - last post before f2f (Wednesday, 13 June)
• Re: Revising 2.4 (Monday, 11 June)
• RE: Reason Revisited (Monday, 11 June)
• Reason Revisited (Sunday, 10 June)
• Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers (Wednesday, 23 May)
• Re: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Wednesday, 23 May)
• RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG? (Tuesday, 22 May)
• Re: More on checkpoint 1.1 (Monday, 21 May)
• words (Monday, 21 May)
• More on checkpoint 1.1 (Monday, 21 May)
• 1.1 revisited (Monday, 21 May)
• Re: the meaning of the term document in WCAG2 (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: the meaning of the term document in WCAG2 (Sunday, 20 May)
• Re: Agenda (Thursday, 17 May)
• Fwd: (X)HTML Version Icons (Wednesday, 16 May)
• Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Illustration - checkpoint proposal (Monday, 14 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Sunday, 13 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Saturday, 12 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Saturday, 12 May)
• RE: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• RE: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Friday, 11 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Thursday, 10 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: Illustrating Guidelines (Wednesday, 9 May)
• Re: URGENT 48 hours to respond: Next face to face (Tuesday, 8 May)
• Re: Kudos for intro (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Kudos for intro (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: WHat makes Icons accessible or not? (Tuesday, 1 May)
• Re: can accessibility be distinguished from usability? (Saturday, 28 April)
• Accessibility and Device Independence (Friday, 27 April)
• RE: Sources and conferences related to cognitive and learning dis abilities (Thursday, 26 April)
• RE: Sources and conferences related to cognitive and learning d isabilities (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: The Comics/Web Connection (was: what type of document do we want?) (Monday, 9 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Sunday, 8 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Saturday, 7 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Saturday, 7 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Tuesday, 3 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Monday, 2 April)
• Re: what type of document do we want? (Monday, 2 April)

Last message date: Saturday, 30 June 2001 21:10:46 UTC