W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: Revising 2.4 to deal with timeout barriers

From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 05:52:39 -0700
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20010523055037.034ff9e0@mail.gorge.net>
To: Adam Victor Reed <areed2@calstatela.edu>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
At 12:31 AM 5/23/01 -0700, Adam Victor Reed wrote:
>does not deal explicitly with timeouts...Mechanisms that required a timed 
>response include:

Pedantically, the fact that timeouts aren't used as an "included mechanism" 
doesn't exclude them.

Of course they should be included but I think this is "editorial".

--
Love.
                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Wednesday, 23 May 2001 08:50:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:10 GMT