W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: Comments on PDF Techniques doc

From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@Adobe.COM>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 19:31:30 -0700
Message-Id: <200105170231.TAA21027@patagonia>
To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
cc: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, ryladog@earthlink.net, kshea@apollo.fedworld.gov, lguarino@Adobe.COM, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
I feel the PDF techniques belong in WCAG rather than ATAG because
we are describing what should be true of the PDF file for it to
be accessible. It should be possible to measure whether a PDF file
satisfies the WCAG requirements, no matter what application was
used to generate it.

It may be stretching the parallel, but some HTML is generated by 
programs and some is hand edited, but we still describe what should
be true about the resulting content.

It is possible to fix some, but not all, of the properties described in these
techniques using tools in Acrobat 5. For instance, an author could
add Alt tags and fix errors in the logical structure. 

Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2001 22:32:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:37 UTC