W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2001

RE: Sources and conferences related to cognitive and learning dis abilities

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 02:26:59 -0400 (EDT)
To: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
cc: "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0104290224000.19781-100000@tux.w3.org>
Well, in that sense nor did english. Communication is not a mathematically
precise exercise, but a "best approximation to something workable". (Or is it
just me that feels that there are many different understandings out there of
the WCAG specifications?)

Charles

  At 01:57 PM 4/26/01 -0400, Bailey, Bruce wrote:
  >Bliss was meant to be a universal written language.  It didn't work out.
Received on Sunday, 29 April 2001 02:27:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:10 GMT