W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: Meta Refresh (was Re: Proposal: 2.4 rewording)

From: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:31:07 -0400 (EDT)
To: Thanasis Kinias <tkinias@optimalco.com>
cc: Matt May <mcmay@bestkungfu.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0106141128400.3192-100000@tux.w3.org>
The responsibility of the author is to do things "the right way", and there
are things that screen readers do handle properly. For example, using HTTP
redirects instead of http-equiv in a meta element.

But there are things over which the author has no control, such as whether
someone is using a browser that just doesn't work.

WCAG compromises (like life really) in the attempt to get a world that works
today and tomorrow. And WCAG 2 doesn't assume all "until user agents" clauses
have been met, but last time we discussed the topic there was an agreement
that things would either be phrased as requirements, or not. (It doesn't
really solve the problem, but it does solve people asking "how do I know if
user agents... yet?")

cheers

Charles

On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Thanasis Kinias wrote:

  On Thursday 14 June 2001 00:36, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
  > Actually, this is a user agent issue.

  WCAG 2 will assume that all "until user agents . . ." have been met?  I
  thought that WCAG meant for pages to be as accessible as possible given the
  capabilities and limitations of deployed UAs.  Charles's response suggests
  that WCAG 2 envisions an ideal UA, which is far from what is available AFAIK.

  Is there no responsibility to design pages which are accessible using
  currently deployed UAs, _with_ all their deficiencies?



-- 
Charles McCathieNevile    http://www.w3.org/People/Charles  phone: +61 409 134 136
W3C Web Accessibility Initiative     http://www.w3.org/WAI    fax: +1 617 258 5999
Location: 21 Mitchell street FOOTSCRAY Vic 3011, Australia
(or W3C INRIA, Route des Lucioles, BP 93, 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France)
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2001 11:31:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:10 GMT