- From: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 06:47:29 -0700
- To: "Matt May" <mcmay@bestkungfu.com>, "Jonathan Chetwynd" <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>, "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
At 3:41 PM -0700 4/23/01, Matt May wrote: >----- Original Message ----- >From: Jonathan Chetwynd > > However, I am not seeking a universal solution applicable to all web pages >WCAG _is_ seeking this, or at least something as close to this as possible. WCAG is seeking to define an approach or approaches that allow everyone access. WCAG 1.0 favored a "universal solution" by mandating "all pages must have <x> and <y> to be accessible," but WCAG 1.0 has been a failure in a number of key areas. WCAG 2.0, I hope, will be able to embrace a broader set of solutions than merely demanding that you have an overloaded single interface which users are expected to deal with regardless of how well it works for them. --Kynn -- Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com> Technical Developer Liaison Reef North America Tel +1 949-567-7006 _________________________________________ BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL. _________________________________________ http://www.reef.com
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2001 10:02:48 UTC