W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: COPUS was Re: alternative content for cognitive disabilities

From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2001 07:35:37 -0400
Message-Id: <>
To: "Jonathan Chetwynd" <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>, "Matt May" <mcmay@bestkungfu.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>

	I would think the simple summaries on those pages would be too difficult
for most of your people to read/understand. Am I wrong?


At 08:38 AM 4/21/01 +0100, Jonathan Chetwynd wrote:
>It remains a fact that unless content is summarised in a suitable form it
>remains inaccessible.
>In the UK a significant part of scientific budgeting is set aside for
>'copus' http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/scforall/copus.htm
> The Committee on the Public Understanding of Science (COPUS) . No one is
>expecting all members of the public to understand all the details, that is
>naturally unachievable. However it is recognised that the public has a right
>to understand what is being funded.
>jonathan chetwynd
>IT teacher (LD)
Anne Pemberton

Received on Saturday, 21 April 2001 07:28:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 16 January 2018 15:33:36 UTC