W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: Meeting agenda

From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 06:59:09 -0400
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20010412065909.007c2d80@pop.erols.com>
To: Jason White <jasonw@ariel.ucs.unimelb.edu.au>, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
In working with the full wording of Guideline 3, the past few evenings, I
have noted that the most important point that some of us have been trying
to hammer home, the need to ILLUSTRATE, is still completely absent from the
guidelines. 

I subsection of 3 needs to explicitely state that illustrations MUST be
present if text is there. This needs to be of the highest priority.

				Anne


At 09:30 AM 4/12/01 +1000, Jason White wrote:
>Thursday, 12 April 2000, 20 hours Coordinated Universal Time--4 PM US
>Eastern, 10 PM France, 6 AM Eastern Australia (+1-617-252-1038):
>
>Agenda
>
>1. Verifiability of compliance with checkpoints in WCAG 2.0. As noted in
>earlier working group discussions, it is easier to verify compliance with
>some checkpoints than with others. How should this difference be addressed
>in the further development of the guidelines? Should certain checkpoints
>be removed, or reduced in status, simply on the ground that it may be
>difficult to determine whether conformance has been achieved?
>
>2. The use of auditory/graphical illustrations in WCAG working group
>documents.
>
>3. The date and location of the next WCAG face to face meeting.
>
>4. The introduction to WCAG 2.0 and the rationale accompanying each
>checkpoints--how should these be improved?
>
>
>
>
Anne Pemberton
apembert@erols.com

http://www.erols.com/stevepem
http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Thursday, 12 April 2001 06:52:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:10 GMT