- From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 21:35:20 -0400
- To: "Paul Bohman" <paulb@cpd2.usu.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Paul, I addressed some realistic aspects of redundency in my post to Cynthis .... in addition ... At 05:24 PM 4/20/01 -0600, Paul Bohman wrote: >For example, users of screen readers often complain of too much content on a >page, or too many links or too much redundancy that they have to listen to. >When you add another type of redundancy, you may in fact confuse the user of >screen reader software (or at least take up his time), and you might confuse >a visual user as well, if the page summary is not handled well in the visual >layout. > If the layout is properly handled, there could be a problem. Locating the summary after the full text would be pretty useless ... the visual reader will never know the summary is there! Deciding how to present a layout that includes all the features for everyone is what I'm trying to do in the illustrations for Guideline 3. Anne Anne Pemberton apembert@erols.com http://www.erols.com/stevepem http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Friday, 20 April 2001 21:28:43 UTC