W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: "CC/PP"

From: Kazuhiro Kitagawa <kaz@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 16:29:37 +0900
Message-ID: <87g0exmo7y.wl@CF-L1.w3.mag.keio.ac.jp>
To: Wendy A Chisholm <wendy@w3.org>
Cc: Kynn Bartlett <kynn-edapta@idyllmtn.com>, Adam Victor Reed <areed2@calstatela.edu>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, kaz@w3.org, ohto@w3.org
Hello Wendy,

At Wed, 25 Apr 2001 03:00:55 -0400,
Wendy A Chisholm wrote:
> 
> Note that CC/PP is listed in the "W3C A to Z" on the left column of the W3C 
> home page (i.e. it's the 14th link on the page).
> 
> Implementations:
> 
> W3C's Jigsaw has a simple implementation: 
> http://www.w3.org/Jigsaw/Doc/Programmer/ccpp.html
> 
> The question about implementations was asked last october to the mobile 
> group, here is Johan's reply:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-mobile/2000Oct/0002.html
> 
> Slides for a talk about the Panda prototype:
> http://www.tom.sfc.keio.ac.jp/~kinuko/slidemaker/0011ccpp/Overview.html
> 
> More info on Panda: http://yax.tom.sfc.keio.ac.jp/panda/
> 

I don't know the information you wrote. But, some of CC/PP specs
are derived from WAP UAProf and CC/PP is used for as a part of WAP
standards, if I understand correctly. That is what I knew. 

Taka and I are responsible for updating CC/PP pages.  It is my fault.
I am sorry for my incomplete work.


-kaz

> The CC/PP work seems to have moved over to the WAP forum - although I have 
> not confirmed this (Kaz or Taka could you comment?). At least it doesn't 
> seem that the CC/PP Web space has been updated recently and Johan discusses 
> the WAP UAPROF working group in his book, "Designing Wireless Information 
> Services."
> 
> I wonder what happened with the CC/PP Implementors Day planned for last 
> November?  I see no record except for this invitation:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ccpp-protocol/2000Sep/0000.html
> 
> --wendy
> 
> At 09:26 PM 4/24/01 , Kynn Bartlett wrote:
> >At 05:43 PM 4/24/2001 , Adam Victor Reed wrote:
> > >You are right, ccpp does seem to be more applicable here than content
> > >negotiation. What is the current status of ccpp? Is there a working
> > >apache module or other implementation available?
> >
> >I don't -think- so.  I wish there were, but I unfortunately have
> >neither the time nor the programming skill to implement it.
> >
> >And of course, until some browsers start SENDING CC/PP profiles, it
> >is not of much use -- yet.  So the call goes out to unite behind
> >CC/PP, talk it up, raise the profile, get people interested!
> >
> >I was on the CC/PP working group at one time, exactly because of
> >the accessibility implications, and I have high hopes for such an
> >aid to adapting content.  I just wish that we could get it in the
> >spotlight more and get some progress going on it!
> >
> >--Kynn
> >
> >PS:  Reef has plans, in the future, to include a CC/PP implementation
> >       in our Reef EveryWare software -- but that is probably a year
> >       off, at least.
> >
> >PS2:  I have started a dialogue with some of the people at Reef
> >        responsible for our web site and hope to see some changes;
> >        I won't guarantee that they'll be all that _I_ want, but
> >        hopefully we can make it better.
> >
> >--
> >Kynn Bartlett <kynn@reef.com>
> >Technical Developer Liaison
> >Reef North America
> >Tel +1 949-567-7006
> >________________________________________
> >BUSINESS IS DYNAMIC. TAKE CONTROL.
> >________________________________________
> >http://www.reef.com
> 
> --
> wendy a chisholm
> world wide web consortium
> web accessibility initiative
> madison, wi usa
> tel: +1 608 663 6346
> /--
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2001 03:35:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:10 GMT