W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-wai-gl@w3.org > April to June 2001

RE: Graphic Designers work - potential for WCAG?

From: Anne Pemberton <apembert@erols.com>
Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 19:26:52 -0400
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20010522192652.00803100@pop.erols.com>
To: love26@gorge.net (William Loughborough), "Bailey, Bruce" <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>, w3c-wai-gl@w3.org, "'Wendy A Chisholm'" <wendy@w3.org>
Cc: "'Meg Ross'" <Meg@digitalMeg.com>
William,

     Hubby is enjoying your earcons... He is LD and Visually Impaired and
color blind on the red-green axis ... 

	Could an earcon be made available to a speech reader without having to
click on it? Would it be useful?

				Anne

At 07:21 AM 5/22/01 -0700, William Loughborough wrote:
>That is fast becoming "when we include icons" - thankfully - and in the
usual sense "professionally" definitely matters. I might be competent to
vote on icon choices but clearly will never "do" any. Earcons, maybe, since
I've been in that general field in the past, but there likely aren't really
any professional "earconists" - yet!
>
>--
>Love.
>                ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE At 07:21 AM 5/22/01
-0700, William Loughborough wrote:
> At 10:11 AM 5/22/01 -0400, Bailey, Bruce wrote:
> if we include icons, they should be done professionally
> "when""""""" - yet!
> 
> --
> Love.
>                 ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE 
Anne Pemberton
apembert@erols.com

http://www.erols.com/stevepem
http://www.geocities.com/apembert45
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2001 19:57:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:47:10 GMT