public-webapps@w3.org from January to March 2010 by date

Wednesday, 31 March 2010

• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Eric Uhrhane
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Exceptions on IndexedDatabaseRequest.open Shawn Wilsher
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Robin Berjon
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Tab Atkins Jr.
• [IndexedDB] Exceptions on IndexedDatabaseRequest.open Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Widget Signature Issue and Proposed Resolution Frederick Hirsch
• [widgets] Draft agenda for 1 April 2010 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Robin Berjon
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Michael Nordman

Tuesday, 30 March 2010

• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Darin Fisher
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Michael Nordman
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Michael Nordman
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Michael Nordman
• Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions Nikunj Mehta
• Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions Jeremy Orlow
• RE: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions Pablo Castro
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Darin Fisher
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter Doug Schepers
• [IndexedDB] Opening a database with a different description Shawn Wilsher
• Re: [IndexedDB] Explaining Asynchronous event-style interface Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Explaining Asynchronous event-style interface Shawn Wilsher
• Re: i18n comments: Marcos Caceres
• Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions Jeremy Orlow
• RE: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Pablo Castro
• RE: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions Pablo Castro
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter Doug Schepers

Monday, 29 March 2010

• Widget Signature Issue and Proposed Resolution Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter Doug Schepers
• Re: i18n comments: Marcos Caceres
• RE: i18n comments: Phillips, Addison
• Re: i18n comments: Marcos Caceres

Friday, 26 March 2010

• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec Kenneth Christiansen
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec Kenneth Christiansen

Monday, 29 March 2010

• Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains Yves Lafon
• Re: i18n comments: Marcos Caceres
• Re: i18n comments: Martin J. Dürst
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter Maciej Stachowiak

Saturday, 27 March 2010

• Re: i18n comments: (was: [widgets] Span example) Felix Sasaki
• Re: i18n comments: (was: [widgets] Span example) Marcos Caceres
• Re: i18n comments: (was: [widgets] Span example) Felix Sasaki

Friday, 26 March 2010

• [widgets] Korean text corrupted Richard Ishida
• i18n comments: (was: [widgets] Span example) Richard Ishida
• RE: [widgets] Span example Richard Ishida
• Review request for icon URI scheme draft Pierre-Antoine LaFayette
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec Marcos Caceres
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter Marcos Caceres
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter Maciej Stachowiak

Thursday, 25 March 2010

• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft Shawn Wilsher
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter Marcos Caceres
• Re: [web databases] SQLStatementErrorCallback João Eiras
• Re: [web databases] SQLStatementErrorCallback Ian Hickson

Wednesday, 24 March 2010

• RE: VMMF - new version David Rogers
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Michael Nordman
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Dmitry Titov
• Re: FormData with sliced Blob Darin Fisher
• Re: [XHR2] term "flag", for authors Sebastián Ramírez
• Re: [Notifications] feedback requested on new Editor's Draft John Gregg
• Re: FormData with sliced Blob Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR2] term "flag", for authors Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Adding Content-Disposition header to File.urn response Darin Fisher
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Darin Fisher
• [XHR2] term "flag", for authors Sebastián Ramírez
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Michael Nordman
• Re: [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Dmitry Titov

Tuesday, 23 March 2010

• Adding Content-Disposition header to File.urn response Jian Li
• Re: [Notifications] feedback requested on new Editor's Draft Ryan Seddon
• [FileAPI] Blob.URN? Darin Fisher
• Re: FormData with sliced Blob Darin Fisher
• Re: [Notifications] feedback requested on new Editor's Draft Drew Wilson
• Re: FormData with sliced Blob Jian Li
• Re: FormData with sliced Blob Jian Li
• Re: FormData with sliced Blob Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [widgets] Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [Notifications] feedback requested on new Editor's Draft Robin Berjon
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter Robin Berjon
• Re: [Notifications] feedback requested on new Editor's Draft Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter Robin Berjon
• Re: FormData with sliced Blob Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter Doug Schepers
• Re: [widgets] Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 Maciej Stachowiak
• Items not listed as "new" in the draft charter Maciej Stachowiak
• [Notifications] feedback requested on new Editor's Draft John Gregg
• Re: FormData with sliced Blob Dmitry Titov
• Re: FormData with sliced Blob Jian Li
• Re: [widgets] Span example Marcos Caceres

Monday, 22 March 2010

• Re: FormData with sliced Blob David Levin
• Re: [IndexedDB] Explaining Asynchronous event-style interface Shawn Wilsher
• Re: [IndexedDB] Explaining Asynchronous event-style interface Shawn Wilsher
• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest Interface Questions Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [widgets] Span example Marcos Caceres
• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest Interface Questions Shawn Wilsher
• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest Interface Questions Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] IDBRequest Interface Questions Shawn Wilsher
• [XHR] setRequestHeader and redirects Christian Biesinger

Saturday, 20 March 2010

• FormData with sliced Blob Jian Li

Monday, 22 March 2010

• Re: [widgets] Span example Scott Wilson
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Marcos Caceres

Sunday, 21 March 2010

• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Pierre-Antoine LaFayette
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Marcos Caceres
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Pierre-Antoine LaFayette

Friday, 19 March 2010

• Handling of locally-served files via XHR and as iframe source SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
• [widgets] URI spec: Note for authors Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] Span example Arthur Barstow

Thursday, 18 March 2010

• DOM 3 Core errata [Was: Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName] Arthur Barstow
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec Simon Fraser
• [widgets] Draft minutes for 18 March 2010 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec Marcos Caceres
• ISSUE-116: Need to flesh out the security considerations for the openURL method in the Widget Interface spec Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Maciej Stachowiak

Wednesday, 17 March 2010

• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Ian Hickson
• Re: ACTION-401Ask WebApps to Review Taxonomy ashok malhotra
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Dumitru Daniliuc
• Websockets API / CloseEvent and readyState Olli Pettay
• Re: Issues with XML Dig Sig and XML Canonicalization; was Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Marcos Caceres
• Re: ACTION-401Ask WebApps to Review Taxonomy Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Span example Marcos Caceres
• [widgets] Draft agenda for 18 March 2010 Voice Conf; ** 1 hr earlier for Europe ** Arthur Barstow
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call João Eiras
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Dumitru Daniliuc

Tuesday, 16 March 2010

• [IndexedDB] IDBRequest Interface Questions Shawn Wilsher
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec Anne van Kesteren
• RE: [widgets] Span example Richard Ishida
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Span example Marcos Caceres
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec Anne van Kesteren
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec Marcos Caceres
• Re: VMMF — new version Marcos Caceres
• [widgets] Span example Richard Ishida
• [widgets] dir and span tests Marcos Caceres
• Request for Comments: Media Resource specs Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements Marcos Caceres

Monday, 15 March 2010

• Re: [IndexedDB] Explaining Asynchronous event-style interface Jeremy Orlow
• [IndexedDB] Dynamic Transactions (WAS: Lots of small nits and clarifying questions) Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] API feedback Jeremy Orlow

Saturday, 13 March 2010

• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Dirk Pranke
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 Nikunj Mehta
• Re: [IndexedDB] API feedback Nikunj Mehta
• [IndexedDB] Explaining Asynchronous event-style interface Nikunj Mehta
• Re: [IndexedDB] API feedback Nikunj Mehta
• Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions Nikunj Mehta
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Shane Harrelson
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Shane Harrelson

Friday, 12 March 2010

• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Dirk Pranke
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Dumitru Daniliuc
• Re: [IndexedDB] API feedback Shawn Wilsher
• Re: [IndexedDB] API feedback Aaron Boodman
• RE: [widgets] dir and span elements Richard Ishida
• Re: [IndexedDB] API feedback Kris Zyp
• Re: [IndexedDB] API feedback Aaron Boodman
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Shane Harrelson
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Kris Zyp
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Dimitri Glazkov
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Dumitru Daniliuc
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call João Eiras
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call João Eiras
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Dumitru Daniliuc
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Shawn Wilsher
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Dumitru Daniliuc
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Michael Nordman
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call João Eiras
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Dumitru Daniliuc

Thursday, 11 March 2010

• Re: Event handlers - Pointer Devices Charles Pritchard
• ACTION-401Ask WebApps to Review Taxonomy ashok malhotra
• Re: CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec Arve Bersvendsen
• CSS WG comments on View Modes Media Feature spec Daniel Glazman

Wednesday, 10 March 2010

• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 Brad Kemper
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 Robin Berjon
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 Daniel Glazman
• Re: VMMF — new version Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements Felix Sasaki
• RE: VMMF — new version David Rogers
• Re: VMMF — new version Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements Marcos Caceres

Tuesday, 9 March 2010

• [cors] Response header whitelist requires changing the API Jaka Jančar

Wednesday, 10 March 2010

• Re: VMMF — new version timeless
• Advanced Pointer Events: Use Cases Charles Pritchard
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? Ian Hickson

Tuesday, 9 March 2010

• Fwd: Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 Daniel Glazman
• Transition announcement: Third LC of wsc-ui Mary Ellen Zurko
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Jeremy Orlow

Monday, 8 March 2010

• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Dumitru Daniliuc
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call João Eiras

Sunday, 7 March 2010

• [widgets] Apache Wookie's W3C Widget parser now available as standalone Java library Scott Wilson

Saturday, 6 March 2010

• RE: Event handlers - Pointer Devices SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements Marcos Caceres

Friday, 5 March 2010

• [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Dumitru Daniliuc
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Dumitru Daniliuc
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Aaron Boodman
• Re: [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Access Request Policy spec; deadline 13-Jan-2010 Scott Wilson
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call João Eiras
• [WebSQLDatabase] Adding a vacuum() call Dumitru Daniliuc

Thursday, 4 March 2010

• RE: [widgets] dir and span elements Richard Ishida
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Nikunj Mehta
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Kris Zyp
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Nikunj Mehta
• [widgets] IESG Approved Media Type application/widget Arthur Barstow
• Re: Event handlers - Pointer Devices Charles Pritchard
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Kris Zyp
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Aaron Boodman
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Kris Zyp
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Mark S. Miller
• Re: [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Access Request Policy spec; deadline 13-Jan-2010 Marcos Caceres
• Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains Thomas Roessler
• Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] Request for Comments: LCWD of Widget Access Request Policy spec; deadline 13-Jan-2010 Robin Berjon
• RE: Event handlers - Pointer Devices SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
• Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: Event handlers - Pointer Devices Doug Schepers
• [widgets] Seeking pre-LCWD comments for View Modes Media Feature; deadline March 17 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains Robin Berjon
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 4 March 2010 voice conference Arthur Barstow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Jeremy Orlow
• RE: Event handlers - Pointer Devices SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (ATTCINW)
• VMMF — new version Robin Berjon

Wednesday, 3 March 2010

• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Kris Zyp
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Jeremy Orlow
• [widgets] Draft agenda for 4 March 2010 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• Re: Information about latest specs for language tagging Marcos Caceres
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Event handlers - Pointer Devices Doug Schepers
• Event handlers - Pointer Devices Charles Pritchard
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Kris Zyp

Tuesday, 2 March 2010

• Re: Last-Event-ID in http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ Julian Reschke
• Re: Last-Event-ID in http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements Scott Wilson
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Last-Event-ID in http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ Julian Reschke
• Re: Last-Event-ID in http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements Marcos Caceres
• Last-Event-ID in http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/ Julian Reschke

Monday, 1 March 2010

• Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions Jeremy Orlow
• RE: [widgets] dir and span elements Phillips, Addison
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements Scott Wilson
• RE: [widgets] dir and span elements Phillips, Addison
• Re: [widgets] dir and span elements Scott Wilson
• Fwd: Information about latest specs for language tagging Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] ITS in Widgets Marcos Caceres
• Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions Nikunj Mehta

Sunday, 28 February 2010

• Re: [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions Jeremy Orlow
• Re: WebSocket API access to headers Ian Hickson

Friday, 26 February 2010

• Re: FormData questions Michael Nordman
• [widgets] dir and span elements Marcos Caceres
• Re: Notifications Dmitry Titov
• Re: [Uri-review] Review request: widget URI scheme Julian Reschke

Thursday, 25 February 2010

• [widgets] Draft minutes from 25 February 2010 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• WebSocket API access to headers Richard Zschech
• Review request: widget URI scheme Robin Berjon

Wednesday, 24 February 2010

• Re: Notifications Doug Schepers
• Re: [widgets] Draft agenda for 25 February 2010 voice conference Steven Pemberton
• [widgets] Draft agenda for 25 February 2010 voice conference Arthur Barstow
• FW: OMTP BONDI 1.1 Approved Release David Rogers
• [WebSQLDatabase] openDatabase() creation callback Dumitru Daniliuc

Tuesday, 23 February 2010

• Re: Notifications Drew Wilson
• File URN lifetimes and SharedWorkers Drew Wilson
• Re: Notifications イアンフェッティ
• Re: Notifications Jonas Sicking
• Re: Notifications Drew Wilson
• Re: Notifications Doug Schepers
• Re: Notifications イアンフェッティ
• Re: Notifications Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Notifications Doug Schepers
• Re: Notifications イアンフェッティ
• Re: Web services and Rich Internet Applications documentation request Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Notifications Jeremy Orlow
• Web services and Rich Internet Applications documentation request David Geer
• Re: Notifications Doug Schepers
• Re: Notifications イアンフェッティ
• Re: XMLHttpRequest send() Method Uploads On Inappropriate HTTP Protocols Julian Reschke
• RE: XMLHttpRequest send() Method Uploads On Inappropriate HTTP Protocols Hans Meiser
• RE: XMLHttpRequest send() Method Uploads On Inappropriate HTTP Protocols Hans Meiser
• Re: XMLHttpRequest send() Method Uploads On Inappropriate HTTP Protocols Anne van Kesteren
• RE: XMLHttpRequest send() Method Uploads On Inappropriate HTTP Protocols Hans Meiser
• Re: XMLHttpRequest send() Method Uploads On Inappropriate HTTP Protocols Anne van Kesteren
• XMLHttpRequest send() Method Uploads On Inappropriate HTTP Protocols Hans Meiser

Monday, 22 February 2010

• Re: [widgets] ITS in Widgets Scott Wilson
• [widgets] ITS in Widgets Marcos Caceres

Saturday, 20 February 2010

• Re: WebSockets questions, bufferedAmount Olli Pettay

Monday, 22 February 2010

• Re: Issues with XML Dig Sig and XML Canonicalization; was Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Henri Sivonen

Saturday, 20 February 2010

• Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations Scott Wilson

Friday, 19 February 2010

• Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations Adam Barth
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Zhiheng Wang
• Re: Web Sockets API, buffer handling after the connection is closed Olli Pettay

Thursday, 18 February 2010

• Re: Web Sockets API, buffer handling after the connection is closed Ian Hickson
• Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations Arve Bersvendsen
• Re: Web Sockets API, buffer handling after the connection is closed Jonas Sicking
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Jonas Sicking
• Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations Scott Wilson
• [widgets] Draft minutes from 18 February 2010 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• [IndexedDB] Lots of small nits and clarifying questions Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Kris Zyp
• Re: [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Joseph Pecoraro
• [IndexedDB] Deleting/managing databases and entity stores Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft Jeremy Orlow
• [IndexedDB] Inverted indexes (for full text search) Jeremy Orlow
• Web Sockets API, buffer handling after the connection is closed Olli Pettay
• [IndexedDB] Promises (WAS: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2) Jeremy Orlow
• RE: [whatwg] Window id - a proposal to leverage session usage in webapplication Mike Wilson
• Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations Thomas Roessler
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing James Robinson
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Zhiheng Wang

Wednesday, 17 February 2010

• [widgets] Draft agenda for 18 February 2010 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) Jonas Sicking
• Re: Social APIs (was: Rechartering WebApp WG) Scott Wilson
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Re: Issues with XML Dig Sig and XML Canonicalization kuehne@trustable.de
• Regrets, RE: [widgets] Draft minutes from 11 February 2010 voice conference Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Social APIs (was: Rechartering WebApp WG) Harry Halpin

Tuesday, 16 February 2010

• Re: How do I join this list? Doug Schepers
• Re: How do I join this list? Doug Schepers
• How do I join this list? David Geer
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) Jonas Sicking
• Re: [widgets-interface] Marking Widget as [NoInterfaceObject] Marcos Caceres
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) Jonas Sicking
• [XHR2] new XMLHttpRequest(anon) Anne van Kesteren
• [XHR] status Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Issues with XML Dig Sig and XML Canonicalization Marcos Caceres
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Anne van Kesteren
• [xhr] authorization (was: Re: call for reviewers: XMLHttpRequest Last Call) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [widgets] TWI: comments Marcos Caceres
• Re: ISSUE-114 (CORS-credentials): CORS does not define the effect of the credentials flag in sufficient detail [CORS] Anne van Kesteren
• Re: ISSUE-115 (xhr-referer): XHR does not specify what URL to use for Referer [XHR] Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: ISSUE-115 (xhr-referer): XHR does not specify what URL to use for Referer [XHR] Anne van Kesteren

Monday, 15 February 2010

• Re: [widgets] Testing infrastructure for Widget Access Request Policy (WARP) spec Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: [widgets] Testing infrastructure for Widget Access Request Policy (WARP) spec Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Testing infrastructure for Widget Access Request Policy (WARP) spec Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• Re: FormData questions Jonas Sicking
• Re: FormData questions Dmitry Titov

Sunday, 14 February 2010

• Re: Social APIs (was: Rechartering WebApp WG) Arthur Barstow
• Re: FormData questions Anne van Kesteren
• Re: FormData questions Jonas Sicking
• Re: FormData questions Dmitry Titov
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Maciej Stachowiak

Saturday, 13 February 2010

• Re: Social APIs (was: Rechartering WebApp WG) Scott Wilson
• Social APIs (was: Rechartering WebApp WG) Doug Schepers
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Anton Muhin
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Ian Hickson
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Scott Wilson
• FormData questions Jonas Sicking

Friday, 12 February 2010

• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Doug Schepers
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Scott Wilson
• Please review LCWD of XML Signature 1.1 and Signature Properties; 2.0 draft information Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Notifications John Gregg
• FYI: W3C Workshop on Future Standards for Model-Based User Interfaces Arthur Barstow
• Re: Notifications Drew Wilson
• Re: Window id - an idea to make multi page web application easier Doug Schepers
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Notifications David Levin
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf Cyril Concolato
• Re: Issues with XML Dig Sig and XML Canonicalization kuehne@trustable.de
• Issues with XML Dig Sig and XML Canonicalization; was Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Marcos Caceres
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Window id - an idea to make multi page web application easier Sebastian Hennebrueder
• Re: Notifications Henri Sivonen
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Anton Muhin
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Scott Wilson
• Re: [XHR] RfC for Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies; deadline 11 March Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Notifications Darin Fisher
• [XHR] RfC for Guidelines for Web Content Transformation Proxies; deadline 11 March Arthur Barstow

Thursday, 11 February 2010

• Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations timeless
• Re: Notifications Dmitry Titov
• Re: [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources Julian Reschke
• [widgets] Testing infrastructure for Widget Access Request Policy (WARP) spec Arthur Barstow
• [notifications] what are the requirements? [Was: Re: Notifications] Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources Doug Schepers
• [widgets] Draft minutes from 11 February 2010 voice conference Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources Boris Zbarsky
• [widgets] Applying Stylesheets to Resources Doug Schepers
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Doug Schepers
• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf Robin Berjon
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Doug Schepers
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Doug Schepers
• Re: Notifications Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• RE: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf Marcin Hanclik
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object Marcos Caceres
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Thomas Roessler
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Arve Bersvendsen
• Re: Notifications Jonas Sicking
• Re: Inconsistency in Web SQL Database Spec Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Doug Schepers
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Doug Schepers
• Re: Notifications Drew Wilson
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Jonas Sicking
• Re: Notifications Jonas Sicking
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Marcos Caceres
• Re: Notifications Drew Wilson
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Jonas Sicking
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations Bil Corry
• Re: Notifications Drew Wilson

Wednesday, 10 February 2010

• Re: Notifications Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Notifications Jonas Sicking
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Notifications Drew Wilson
• Re: Notifications Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Notifications Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Notifications Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Notifications Drew Wilson
• Re: Notifications John Gregg
• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf Stephen Jolly
• Re: XHR HTTP method support, Re: XHR LC comments Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR HTTP method support, Re: XHR LC comments Julian Reschke
• Re: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf Cyril Concolato
• RE: [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf David Rogers
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 11 February 2010 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• [widgets] LCWDs of XML Signature specs published Arthur Barstow
• Re: Notifications Henri Sivonen
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations Bil Corry

Tuesday, 9 February 2010

• Re: Inconsistency in Web SQL Database Spec Eric Westenberger
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations Aryeh Gregor
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Scott Wilson
• Re: [widgets] TWI: comments Scott Wilson
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object Scott Wilson
• Re: Inconsistency in Web SQL Database Spec Anne van Kesteren
• Inconsistency in Web SQL Database Spec Eric Westenberger
• Re: Rechartering WebApp WG Arthur Barstow
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations Thomas Roessler
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations Anne van Kesteren
• Re: MPEG-U Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets] TWI: comments Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object Robin Berjon
• Re: MPEG-U Robin Berjon
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations Thomas Roessler
• Re: [widgets] TWI: comments Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object Marcos Caceres
• Re: MPEG-U Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets] TWI: comments Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets] TWI: comments Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets] API - openURL security considerations Adam Barth

Monday, 8 February 2010

• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations Julian Reschke
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations Anne van Kesteren
• [widgets] API - openURL security considerations Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object Robin Berjon
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [widgets] TWI: comments Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] TWI: comments Robin Berjon
• Rechartering WebApp WG Doug Schepers

Friday, 5 February 2010

• Re: Notifications John Gregg
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Notifications Drew Wilson
• Re: Notifications Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Notifications Drew Wilson
• Re: Notifications David Levin
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object Cyril Concolato
• [widgets] Important Test Suite Updates Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets-twi] window object Marcos Caceres
• Re: Notifications Anne van Kesteren

Thursday, 4 February 2010

• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Kenton Varda
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Thomas Broyer
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Tyler Close
• [widgets] TWI: comments Cyril Concolato
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Lenny Rachitsky
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 Arthur Barstow
• [widgets-twi] window object Cyril Concolato
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Jonas Sicking
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations Thomas Roessler
• RE: [WARP] Use cases for local network access Marcin Hanclik
• Re: [WARP] Use cases for local network access Stephen Jolly
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 4-Feb-2010 voice conference Arthur Barstow
• Re: [WARP] Use cases for local network access Arve Bersvendsen
• Re: MPEG-U Robin Berjon

Tuesday, 2 February 2010

• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing lenny.rachitsky
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Lenny Rachitsky
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Lenny Rachitsky

Monday, 1 February 2010

• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Lenny Rachitsky

Thursday, 4 February 2010

• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Adam Barth
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme timeless
• Re: [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()) Maciej Stachowiak
• [UMP] Subsetting (was: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()) Mark S. Miller
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Adam Barth
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Maciej Stachowiak

Wednesday, 3 February 2010

• Re: Notifications John Gregg
• Re: Notifications Drew Wilson
• Re: Notifications Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Tyler Close
• Re: Notifications John Gregg
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Julian Reschke
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Julian Reschke
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Zhiheng Wang
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Tyler Close
• Re: Notifications Drew Wilson
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Zhiheng Wang
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Julian Reschke
• Re: Notifications Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Jonas Sicking
• Standardizing Web Timing? Arthur Barstow
• Re: Notifications Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Tyler Close
• Re: Notifications Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Notifications John Gregg
• Re: Notifications Drew Wilson
• Re: Notifications Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Notifications Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Notifications Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Jonas Sicking
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Adam Barth
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Adam Barth
• Re: Notifications Drew Wilson
• Re: Notifications John Gregg
• Re: Notifications Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Notifications John Gregg
• Re: Notifications Olli Pettay
• Re: Notifications Olli Pettay
• Re: Notifications Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Notifications Drew Wilson
• Re: Notifications John Gregg
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Tyler Close
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Tyler Close
• Notifications Olli Pettay
• Re: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication Marcos Caceres
• RE: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication David Rogers
• Re: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication Arthur Barstow
• RE: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication David Rogers
• Re: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication Arthur Barstow
• RE: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication David Rogers
• Re: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication Marcos Caceres
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Pierre-Antoine LaFayette
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 4 February 2010 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication Arthur Barstow
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Maciej Stachowiak
• ISSUE-115 (xhr-referer): XHR does not specify what URL to use for Referer [XHR] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-114 (CORS-credentials): CORS does not define the effect of the credentials flag in sufficient detail [CORS] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: [widgets] Null in P&C Marcos Caceres
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Jonas Sicking
• Re: MPEG-U Cyril Concolato
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Tyler Close
• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft Kris Zyp
• RE: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft Pablo Castro
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Jonas Sicking
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Window id - an idea to make multi page web application easier Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Maciej Stachowiak

Tuesday, 2 February 2010

• Re: element.onresize Olli Pettay
• Re: element.onresize Jonas Sicking
• Re: element.onresize Olli Pettay
• element.onresize Gregg Tavares
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing James Robinson
• Re: [widgets] Null in P&C Doug Schepers
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 Kris Zyp
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Tyler Close
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Zhiheng Wang
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Zhiheng Wang
• [WARP] Use cases for local network access Stephen Jolly
• Re: One <feature>, multiple resources Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Null in P&C Marcos Caceres
• Re: One <feature>, multiple resources Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Null in P&C Simon Pieters
• Re: [widgets] Null in P&C Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] Null in P&C Thomas Roessler
• [widgets] Null in P&C Marcos Caceres
• RE: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 Pablo Castro
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. Ian Hickson
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Minor change to spec? Dumitru Daniliuc
• Re: [WebSQLDatabase] Minor change to spec? Ian Hickson
• [WebSQLDatabase] Minor change to spec? Dumitru Daniliuc

Monday, 1 February 2010

• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Jonas Sicking
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Dmitry Titov
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. Sebastian Andersson
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Julian Reschke
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Pierre-Antoine LaFayette
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests Jonas Sicking
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Pierre-Antoine LaFayette
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests Jonas Sicking
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme イアンフェッティ
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests Jonas Sicking
• Re: [XHR] New api request Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] New api request Pedro Santos
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. Ian Hickson
• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Some IndexedDB feedback Jeremy Orlow
• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft Nikunj Mehta
• Re: Some IndexedDB feedback Nikunj Mehta
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 Nikunj Mehta
• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft Nikunj Mehta
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme timeless
• Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Jonas Sicking
• Re: Seeking implementation data for CORS and UMP Jonas Sicking

Friday, 29 January 2010

• Re: [XHR] New api request James Robinson

Monday, 1 February 2010

• Re: [xhr] events for async requests (was: Re: [whatwg] Thread to run Web Socket feedback from the protocol ?) Jonas Sicking

Sunday, 31 January 2010

• [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest() Anne van Kesteren
• ISSUE-113 (resize): Clarify when resize events fire [DOM3 Events] Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• Seeking implementation data for CORS and UMP Arthur Barstow
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. Sebastian Andersson
• Re: [XHR] same-origin request event rules are underspecified Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [xhr] events for async requests (was: Re: [whatwg] Thread to run Web Socket feedback from the protocol ?) Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR] New api request Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [XHR][XHR2] HTTP redirects / XHR Version detection Anne van Kesteren
• RE: Microsoft pre-LCWD feedback on WebSocket API Ian Hickson
• Some IndexedDB feedback Jeremy Orlow

Saturday, 30 January 2010

• Re: [XHR][XHR2] HTTP redirects / XHR Version detection David Bruant
• Re: [XHR][XHR2] HTTP redirects / XHR Version detection Anne van Kesteren
• Re: Feedback on WebSocket API, Editor's Draft 13 November 2009. Ian Hickson
• Re: The most basic File API use case Eric Uhrhane

Friday, 29 January 2010

• [Bug 8241] Named properties on window bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 Dean Landolt
• [widgets] follow-ups on the URI scheme spec Arthur Barstow
• Re: localStorage Event Jared Morse
• Re: localStorage Event Jeremy Orlow
• Re: localStorage Event Jared Morse
• Re: localStorage Event Jeremy Orlow
• Re: localStorage Event Jared Morse
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Pierre-Antoine LaFayette
• Re: Window id - an idea to make multi page web application easier Sebastian Hennebrueder
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Olli Pettay
• Re: Window id - an idea to make multi page web application easier Arthur Barstow
• [widgets-interface] Marking Widget as [NoInterfaceObject] Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• [XHR] New api request Pedro Santos
• One <feature>, multiple resources Arve Bersvendsen
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Jonas Sicking
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Zhiheng Wang
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme イアンフェッティ
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme イアンフェッティ

Thursday, 28 January 2010

• Re: localStorage Event Jonas Sicking
• Re: localStorage Event Olli Pettay
• Re: localStorage Event Jeremy Orlow
• [widgets] TWI: Fixes to test cases Scott Wilson
• Re: localStorage Event Jared Morse
• Re: localStorage Event Olli Pettay
• Re: localStorage Event Jared Morse
• Re: localStorage Event Olli Pettay
• localStorage Event Jared Morse
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Adam Barth
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Adam Barth
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Jonas Sicking
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Robert O'Callahan
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Jonas Sicking
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Jonas Sicking
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Zhiheng Wang

Wednesday, 27 January 2010

• XHR Pedro Santos
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 Kris Zyp
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Jonas Sicking
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft Jonas Sicking
• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Pierre-Antoine LaFayette
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Pierre-Antoine LaFayette
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Pierre-Antoine LaFayette
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Pierre-Antoine LaFayette
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Juan Lanus
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Jonas Sicking
• [WebTiming] HTMLElement timing Zhiheng Wang
• Re: Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase) Nikunj Mehta
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Robert O'Callahan
• Re: Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase) Jeremy Orlow
• [FastMutation] Updated Proposal on the DOM L3 Events Wiki Travis Leithead

Tuesday, 26 January 2010

• Re: [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft Nikunj Mehta
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Maciej Stachowiak
• [IndexedDB] Detailed comments for the current draft Pablo Castro
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Juan Lanus
• XQuery WG Comments on Indexed Database API John Snelson
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Pierre-Antoine LaFayette
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Adam Barth
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Lachlan Hunt

Monday, 25 January 2010

• [Bug 8814] New: Introduction paragraph and example are out of sync bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re: Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Adam Barth

Saturday, 23 January 2010

• [XHR][XHR2] HTTP redirects / XHR Version detection David Bruant

Sunday, 24 January 2010

• Steps to creating a browser standard for the moz-icon:// scheme Pierre-Antoine LaFayette
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Robert O'Callahan

Saturday, 23 January 2010

• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Juan Lanus

Friday, 22 January 2010

• Re: Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase) Jeremy Orlow
• Re: Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase) Nikunj Mehta
• Allow to return same NodeList object for queries like getElementsByTagName, getElementsByClassName and getElementsByName Anton Muhin
• Re: Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase) Maciej Stachowiak
• Interface names in IndexedDB (and WebSQLDatabase) Jeremy Orlow

Thursday, 21 January 2010

• Re: A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology) Marcos Caceres
• Re: A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology) Marcos Caceres
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Jian Li
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Dmitry Titov
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Michael Nordman
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Jonas Sicking
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Eric Uhrhane
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Jian Li
• Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2 Bert Bos
• Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 Adam Barth
• Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2 Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2 Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2 Bert Bos
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 21 January 2010 voice conference Arthur Barstow
• Re: [WARP] Extending access to local network resources Arve Bersvendsen
• Re: [WARP] Extending access to local network resources Stephen Jolly
• Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 Julian Reschke
• Re: [WARP] Extending access to local network resources Arve Bersvendsen
• Re: FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 Adam Barth

Wednesday, 20 January 2010

• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Eric Uhrhane
• FYI: review of draft-abarth-mime-sniff-03 Larry Masinter
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Dmitry Titov
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Eric Uhrhane
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Dmitry Titov
• [widgets] TWI test case errors Scott Wilson
• RE: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 Adrian Bateman
• Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2 Andrew Fedoniouk
• Re: [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2 Doug Schepers
• Re: MPEG-U Doug Schepers
• [widgets] Draft agenda for 21 January 2010 voice conf Arthur Barstow
• Re: A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology) Scott Wilson
• Re: A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology) Marcos Caceres
• Re: A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology) Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• [selectors-api] comments on Selectors API Level 2 Daniel Glazman
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 Jonas Sicking
• Re: MPEG-U Cyril Concolato
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 Nikunj Mehta

Tuesday, 19 January 2010

• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 Jeremy Orlow
• Re: A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology) Doug Schepers
• A Method for Writing Testable Conformance Clauses and its Applications (Was Re: Write up of test assertion extraction methodology) Marcos Caceres
• Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Indexed Database API; deadline February 2 Arthur Barstow
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? Arthur Barstow
• [widgets] P&C typo in 9.1.9. Rule for Parsing a Non-negative Integer Marcos Caceres
• [XHR] XMLHttpRequest specification lacks security considerations Thomas Roessler
• [XHR] same-origin request event rules are underspecified Thomas Roessler

Monday, 18 January 2010

• Window id - an idea to make multi page web application easier Sebastian Hennebrueder
• Re: Re-introduction Nikunj Mehta
• Re: Re-introduction Arthur Barstow
• RE: IndexedDB and MVCC Pablo Castro
• Re: Re-introduction Charles McCathieNevile

Sunday, 17 January 2010

• [Bug 8241] Named properties on window bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• Re-introduction Nikunj Mehta

Friday, 15 January 2010

• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Dmitry Titov
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Jonas Sicking
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Dmitry Titov
• IndexedDB and MVCC Chris Anderson
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Jonas Sicking
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Darin Fisher
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Dmitry Titov
• Re: CfC: to publish FPWD of Selectors API Level 2; deadline January 15 Arthur Barstow
• Re: CfC: to publish FPWD of Selectors API Level 2; deadline January 15 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Restart the group Arthur Barstow
• Re: Restart the group Rokesh Jankie
• Re: Restart the group Lachlan Hunt
• Restart the group Rokesh Jankie
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Robert O'Callahan
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Jonas Sicking
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Darin Fisher
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in Tyler Close

Thursday, 14 January 2010

• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Jian Li
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in Adam Barth
• [Bug 8758] New: Define DOMContentLoaded bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
• [WARP] Extending access to local network resources Stephen Jolly
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in Tyler Close
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? Maciej Stachowiak
• [widgets][vmmf] clarifications Marcin Hanclik
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? Arthur Barstow

Wednesday, 13 January 2010

• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Dmitry Titov
• Re: MPEG-U Doug Schepers
• Re: MPEG-U Cyril Concolato
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 Marcos Caceres
• [widgets] No Voice Conf on 14 January; next call is 21 January Arthur Barstow
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Jonas Sicking
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 Robin Berjon
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in Devdatta
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in Adam Barth
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Chris Prince
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization Tyler Close
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 Jonas Sicking
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in Tyler Close
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 Tyler Close
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 Tyler Close
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 Mark S. Miller
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in Mark S. Miller
• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 Jonas Sicking

Tuesday, 12 January 2010

• Re: CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 Adam Barth
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Jonas Sicking
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Arun Ranganathan
• CfC: to publish First Public Working Draft of Uniform Messaging Policy spec; deadline January 19 Arthur Barstow
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in Adam Barth
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in Tyler Close
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization Adam Barth
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in Adam Barth
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in Tyler Close
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in Adam Barth
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in Tyler Close
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization Tyler Close
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [UMP] Server opt-in Adam Barth
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization Adam Barth
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Dmitry Titov
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization Tyler Close
• Re: MPEG-U Robin Berjon
• Re: MPEG-U Cyril Concolato
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? Arthur Barstow
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization Adam Barth

Monday, 11 January 2010

• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Sean Hogan
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization Tyler Close
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? Arthur Barstow
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Tab Atkins Jr.
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: MPEG-U Robin Berjon
• Re: [selectors-api2] Should we keep the queryScopedSelector methods? (was: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD?) Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Sean Hogan
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Sean Hogan
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Sean Hogan
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Sean Hogan
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Boris Zbarsky
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Sean Hogan

Sunday, 10 January 2010

• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read Tyler Close
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization Adam Barth
• Re: [UMP] Proxy-Authorization Tyler Close
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Sean Hogan
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read Maciej Stachowiak

Saturday, 9 January 2010

• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read Adam Barth
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? Sigbjorn Finne
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read Tyler Close
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read Adam Barth
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? Ian Hickson
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read Tyler Close
• [UMP] Proxy-Authorization Adam Barth
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read Tyler Close
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read Adam Barth
• Re: CfC: to publish FPWD of Selectors API Level 2; deadline January 15 Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: CfC: to publish FPWD of Selectors API Level 2; deadline January 15 Jonas Sicking
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read Tyler Close
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? Arthur Barstow
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? Sigbjorn Finne
• CfC: to publish FPWD of Selectors API Level 2; deadline January 15 Arthur Barstow
• Re: Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? Jonas Sicking
• Adopting postMessage and MessageChannel from HTML5? Ian Hickson
• Re: File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Dmitry Titov
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read Adam Barth
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read Tyler Close

Friday, 8 January 2010

• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read Adam Barth
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read Tyler Close
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read Tyler Close
• Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read Adam Barth
• File API: Blob and underlying file changes. Dmitry Titov
• [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read Adam Barth
• Introducing Rokesh Jankie, for the Web Applications groups Rokesh Jankie
• Re: Letter to the W3C Web Applications WG from ISO JTC1/SC 34/WG4 Arthur Barstow
• Editorial Update: Signature Properties Frederick Hirsch
• [UMP] A declarative version of "Uniform Messaging Policy" Tyler Close

Thursday, 7 January 2010

• RE: [widgets] DigSig - proposed change to XML Signature Properties Scott Cantor
• Re: [widgets] DigSig - proposed change to XML Signature Properties Frederick Hirsch
• [widgets] DigSig - proposed change to XML Signature Properties Arthur Barstow
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? Cyril Concolato
• Re: MPEG-U Cyril Concolato
• [widgets] Draft Minutes for 7 January 2010 Voice Conference Arthur Barstow
• Publishing Selectors API Level 2 as an FPWD? Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [widgets] white space handling Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] white space handling Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? Robin Berjon

Wednesday, 6 January 2010

• Re: [widgets] white space handling Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] white space handling Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? Marcos Caceres
• MPEG-U Robin Berjon
• [widgets] Draft Agenda for 7 January 2010 Voice Conf Arthur Barstow
• Re: [UMP] updated editor's draft of "Uniform Messaging Policy" on W3C site Tyler Close
• Re: [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial) Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? Robin Berjon
• Re: [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial) Scott Wilson
• Re: [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial) Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? Scott Wilson
• Re: [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial) Scott Wilson
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? Cyril Concolato
• Re: [UMP] updated editor's draft of "Uniform Messaging Policy" on W3C site Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial) Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets] features: default value for required Cyril Concolato
• Re: [widgets] duplicated feature elements ? Cyril Concolato
• [Bug 8241] Named properties on window bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

Tuesday, 5 January 2010

• Re: [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ? Marcos Caceres
• [UMP] updated editor's draft of "Uniform Messaging Policy" on W3C site Tyler Close
• Re: [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial) Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] features: default value for required Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] duplicated feature elements ? Marcos Caceres
• Re: [widgets] duplicated feature elements ? Marcos Caceres
• Transition Nikunj Mehta
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Boris Zbarsky
• [widgets] Reminder: RfC for LCWD of Widget Access Request Policy spec; deadline 13-Jan-2010 Arthur Barstow
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Julian Reschke
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Jonas Sicking
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [DataCache] General Comments and Correction for the New WD Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: [DataCache] Updated Examples Nikunj R. Mehta

Monday, 4 January 2010

• Re: [DataCache] Unhandled Cases in Networking Changes Joseph Pecoraro
• Re: [DataCache] Unhandled Cases in Networking Changes Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: [DataCache] Remove or Replace a Local Server Handler? Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: [DataCache] General Comments and Correction for the New WD Joseph Pecoraro
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Boris Zbarsky
• Re: [DataCache] General Comments and Correction for the New WD Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Julian Reschke
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Julian Reschke
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Boris Zbarsky
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Julian Reschke
• Re: XHR LC comment: header encoding Anne van Kesteren
• CfC: new WD of Programmable HTTP Caching and Serving; deadline January 11 Arthur Barstow

Friday, 1 January 2010

• [DataCache] General Comments and Correction for the New WD Joseph Pecoraro
• Re: [DataCache] Event Handlers on DataCache Joseph Pecoraro
• Re: [DataCache] Unhandled Cases in Networking Changes Joseph Pecoraro
• Re: [DataCache] Updated Examples Joseph Pecoraro
• Re: [DataCache] "ready" CacheEvent and Related Questions Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: [DataCache] Event Handlers on DataCache Nikunj R. Mehta
• [DataCache] Editor's draft now ready for WD publication Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: [DataCache] Updated Examples Nikunj R. Mehta
• Re: [DataCache] Unhandled Cases in Networking Changes Nikunj R. Mehta

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 March 2010 22:56:37 UTC