- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 07:49:55 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 1/5/10 5:03 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > More concretely, this means that combined with the rules coming from > HTTP a SYNTAX_ERR exception would be raised for the value argument if > one of the characters has a code point larger than U+00FF, if the code > point is U+007F, or if the code point is smaller than U+0020 but is not > U+0009. If this is all ok the lower bytes are collected as the new > header value. > > Does this sound acceptable to implementors? Apart from the obvious worry of switching away from a behavior that the vast majority of UAs currently implement, with the ensuing potential for website breakage, sounds fine... -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2010 12:50:30 UTC