- From: Michael Nordman <michaeln@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 17:00:48 -0700
- To: Darin Fisher <darin@chromium.org>
- Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Web Applications Working Group WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Eric Uhrhane <ericu@google.com>
- Message-ID: <p2tfa2eab051003301700le19dc75ci32c79e392c340b1d@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Darin Fisher <darin@chromium.org> wrote: > The only way to get a FileWriter at the moment is from <input > type="saveas">. What is desired is a way to simulate the load of a resource > with Content-Disposition: attachment that would trigger the browser's > download manager. When it comes to questions like these (when offline, how to do something that happens in the online case)... i tend to say why not do it exactly the same way as its done in the online case... so load a resource with a Content-Disposition:attachment header on it :) > > -Darin > > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:32 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > >> What's the use case for specifying the Content-Disposition mime type. >> The ones I've heard so far seems better solved using the FileWriter >> [1] API. >> >> [1] http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/file-system/file-writer.html >> >> / Jonas >> >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Michael Nordman <michaeln@google.com> >> wrote: >> > There is more than just the mime type when dealing with the URLs. >> > There at least two content headers of interest, Content-Type >> > and Content-Disposition. >> > Whatever mechanism involved should allow for both of these content >> headers >> > to be set >> > by the web application. >> > >> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Darin Fisher <darin@chromium.org> >> wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Darin Fisher <darin@chromium.org> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Apologies if this has been discussed before, but I'm curious why >> URN >> >> >> > is >> >> >> > not >> >> >> > a property of Blob. It seems like it would be useful to be able >> to >> >> >> > load >> >> >> > a >> >> >> > slice of a File. For example, this could be used by an >> application >> >> >> > to >> >> >> > fetch >> >> >> > all of its subresources out of a single file. >> >> >> >> >> >> IIRC originally it was placed on File since Blobs do not have a >> >> >> content type. However I think there is general agreement that it >> >> >> should be moved to Blob. >> >> >> >> >> >> However it would be great to be able to assign a content type to a >> >> >> Blob. Possibly slice() could take a optional argument. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Adding an optional parameter to slice() sounds attractive indeed. >> >> > BlobBuilder [1] should probably also have such an optional argument. >> >> >> >> Indeed! >> >> >> >> / Jonas >> >> >> > >> > >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 31 March 2010 00:01:18 UTC