- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 11:25:11 +0100
- To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Cc: "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:45:54 +0100, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> > wrote: >> I'm not really convinced we need all of >> >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/UMP/ >> >> to handle the simple use case it is for. I think UMP can be layered on >> top >> of CORS by simply letting the origin be a unique identifier and always >> have >> the credentials flag be false. A new constructor could be used for >> XMLHttpRequest -- maybe called AnonXMLHttpRequest() -- to enable this >> behavior. >> >> Since most people in the WG seem to think we should have both UMP and >> CORS >> this solution seems much more straightforward and practical. >> >> Thoughts? > > What do you mean by "unique identifier"? The same as HTML5? I.e. something that results in Origin: null. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 1 February 2010 10:25:46 UTC