- From: Jian Li <jianli@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 17:26:32 -0700
- To: David Levin <levin@google.com>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
- Message-ID: <a95818c31003221726l2655a552y45174e8e6154edb8@mail.gmail.com>
To be safe, probably UA can choose to create the unique name from the GUID, like blob-5597cb2e-74fb-479a-81e8-10679c523118. On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:43 PM, David Levin <levin@google.com> wrote: > What about using a filename that is unique with repect to files sent in > that FormData (but it is up to the UA)? For example, a UA may choose to do > Blob1, Blob2, etc. For the content-type, application/octet-string seems most > fitting. > > Here's the result applied to your example: > ------SomeBoundary... > Content-Disposition: form-data; name="file"; filename="Blob1" > Content-Type: application/octet-string > > dave > > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Jian Li <jianli@google.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I have questions regarding sending FormData with sliced files. When we >> send a FormData with a regular file, we send out the multipart data for this >> file, like the following: >> >> ------SomeBoundary... >> Content-Disposition: form-data; name="file"; filename="test.js" >> Content-Type: application/x-javascript >> ... >> >> However, when it is sliced into a blob, it does not have the file name and >> type information any more. I am wondering what we should send. Should we >> just not provide the filename and Content-Type information? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jian >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 23 March 2010 00:27:03 UTC