- From: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:49:14 +0100
- To: Shawn Wilsher <sdwilsh@mozilla.com>
- Cc: Nikunj Mehta <nikunj@o-micron.com>, public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5dd9e5c51003301349x69650159w71d60b02e35c3dc7@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Shawn Wilsher <sdwilsh@mozilla.com> wrote: > On 3/22/2010 10:49 AM, Shawn Wilsher wrote: > >> On 3/13/2010 1:43 AM, Nikunj Mehta wrote: >> >>> As specced, it is possible to have multiple concurrent requests at >>> various API entry points, except for the IndexedDatabaseRequest >>> interface. In this particular case, you can only have one request to >>> open a database in a Window object. Given that this is setup kind of >>> work, it does not appear that this limitation amounts to much. If >>> multiple connections to a single DB are required, or if different DBs >>> have to be opened, that would have to be done sequentially, i.e., start >>> a new request only after the previous one completed. >>> >> This seems like an artificial constraint to me. Is there any reason why >> we couldn't open up more than one database connection at a time (or at >> least allow the possibility for a UA to do so). >> > In fact, I realized a use case today that makes this constraint difficult > to work around. Say you have two different libraries that use indexedDB. > You'll now have to be careful when you initialize each library so they > don't try to open a database at the same time. Even then, if they open up > databases on the fly, you'd have to be very careful to make sure they don't > stomp on each other. > > Having open return an IDBRequest and not having the request property on > IndexedDatabaseRequest would solve this problem. I'm going to prototype an > implementation in Mozilla this way to see if any issues come up, but I don't > currently foresee any. > The implementation I'm working on in WebKit is callback(s passed into each method call) based. I guess this will make it easier to compare and contrast the approaches. J
Received on Tuesday, 30 March 2010 20:50:04 UTC