Am 23. Februar 2010 12:11 schrieb Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>: > On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:20:13 +0100, Ian Fette (イアンフェッティ) < > ifette@google.com> wrote: > >> CreateInteractiveNotification(in DOMString text-fallback, [Optional] in >> DOMString MimeType1, [Optional] in DOMString NotificationFormat1, >> [Optional] >> in DOMString MimeType2, [Optional] NotificationFormat2, ...) >> >> forgive my broken IDL, I'm sure there's a better way to express it, but >> you get the idea. >> > > I don't see why it cannot be just a URL. If the user agent "supports" the > type it will render it and it will fail otherwise. There's no need for > complex multi-level fallback here in my opinion, nobody is going to bother > with that anyway. > > <video> has multi-level fallback, so there is precedent for better or worse. That said, specifying a (set of) URL(s) may be fine, but I think it would still be nice for a UA to have fallback options. Is everyone going to use it? Probably not, but I think people that actually care would. E.g. if I have a property that I expect people on mobile devices to go to, I will make sure that it works on mobile devices, exactly as we do with properties today where we reasonably expect mobile users. -Ian > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > http://annevankesteren.nl/ >
Received on Tuesday, 23 February 2010 20:33:54 UTC