Re: [XHR2] AnonXMLHttpRequest()

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote:
> I'm not really convinced we need all of
>
>  http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/UMP/
>
> to handle the simple use case it is for. I think UMP can be layered on top
> of CORS by simply letting the origin be a unique identifier and always have
> the credentials flag be false. A new constructor could be used for
> XMLHttpRequest -- maybe called AnonXMLHttpRequest() -- to enable this
> behavior.
>
> Since most people in the WG seem to think we should have both UMP and CORS
> this solution seems much more straightforward and practical.
>
> Thoughts?

What do you mean by "unique identifier"?

/ Jonas

Received on Monday, 1 February 2010 02:46:41 UTC