- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2010 18:45:54 -0800
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > I'm not really convinced we need all of > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/UMP/ > > to handle the simple use case it is for. I think UMP can be layered on top > of CORS by simply letting the origin be a unique identifier and always have > the credentials flag be false. A new constructor could be used for > XMLHttpRequest -- maybe called AnonXMLHttpRequest() -- to enable this > behavior. > > Since most people in the WG seem to think we should have both UMP and CORS > this solution seems much more straightforward and practical. > > Thoughts? What do you mean by "unique identifier"? / Jonas
Received on Monday, 1 February 2010 02:46:41 UTC