- From: David Rogers <david.rogers@omtp.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:29:54 -0000
- To: <timeless@gmail.com>, "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: "public-webapps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
A small comment. It's probably best to use the OED for English dictionary words rather than a google search: http://www.askoxford.com/results/?view=dict&freesearch=immersive&branch=13842570&textsearchtype=exact David. -----Original Message----- From: public-webapps-request@w3.org [mailto:public-webapps-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of timeless Sent: 10 March 2010 08:55 To: Robin Berjon Cc: public-webapps WG Subject: Re: VMMF — new version On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: > I just produced an update of VMMF to make it ready for publication: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/. > > Essentially I changed it so that it corresponds to CSS Media Queries. That, plus it being a UI oriented specification, means that there's only one normative assertion and it's a SHOULD. > > Comments welcome, I think that this baby can ship. Just to be difficult, i object to maximized being misspelled by an old-worlder. I'd suggest "max" or "maxed" as a compromise :) > widgets that have no chrome and that therefore could masquerade some other existing objects on the screen. s/therefore could/could therefore/ > (e.g. tool bars, title bars, menus, etc.). > (e.g. the menu bar, the clock and similar icons, the system menu, etc.). the use of 'e.g.' is generally incompatible with 'etc.' > The view mode is the manner in which a widget is presented to a user that corresponds to the metaphors and functionalities in use on a given functionality [N-UNCOUNT] > Describes a widget providing a more immersive interface, Google says that "immersive" isn't in their dictionary, Firefox concurs. Oh well, the web and its 3 million hits evolves to provide such terms.
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 15:30:31 UTC