- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 23:18:27 -0500
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- CC: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi, Maciej- Thanks for the feedback. Maciej Stachowiak wrote (on 2/10/10 8:10 PM): > > Some comments: > > - I would like to suggest the name "Web Messaging" for the postMessage / > MessageChannel deliverable. Done. > - I think the "Other Specifications" section should be clear on the > right process for adopting new deliverables without having to recharter. > I think we want a process that is flexible but that retains transparency > and accountability. I like the idea of writing requirements documents > for these. Perhaps there should be some sort of review process for these > requirements documents, in lieu of a full recharter cycle. Sure, let's discuss this as a group to see what we are all comfortable with, and I will tighten up the language accordingly. Right now, I don't know exactly what else to say. > - I think errata for the existing DOM specs should be stated as > in-scope. I believe we are the right group to do this, but it's better > to be explicit. I think this would include even DOM specs where we may > not plan to publish a whole new version. Clarified. > - I think it's no longer necessary to cite the previous Web API and WAF > charters. If we do cite a previous charter it should be the previous > version of the Web Apps WG charter, It hink. Corrected. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Thursday, 11 February 2010 04:18:30 UTC