- From: David Levin <levin@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:43:00 -0700
- To: Jian Li <jianli@google.com>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org
- Message-ID: <q2pb902e34a1003221643p3f15c7c7q8e5b87951db38966@mail.gmail.com>
What about using a filename that is unique with repect to files sent in that FormData (but it is up to the UA)? For example, a UA may choose to do Blob1, Blob2, etc. For the content-type, application/octet-string seems most fitting. Here's the result applied to your example: ------SomeBoundary... Content-Disposition: form-data; name="file"; filename="Blob1" Content-Type: application/octet-string dave On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 6:25 PM, Jian Li <jianli@google.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I have questions regarding sending FormData with sliced files. When we send > a FormData with a regular file, we send out the multipart data for this > file, like the following: > > ------SomeBoundary... > Content-Disposition: form-data; name="file"; filename="test.js" > Content-Type: application/x-javascript > ... > > However, when it is sliced into a blob, it does not have the file name and > type information any more. I am wondering what we should send. Should we > just not provide the filename and Content-Type information? > > Thanks, > > Jian > > >
Received on Monday, 22 March 2010 23:43:30 UTC