- From: Nikunj Mehta <nikunj@o-micron.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 01:54:24 -0800
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@google.com>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <3F488147-1414-454F-A67D-6F9DEAAA2DC1@o-micron.com>
On Jan 19, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: > > On Jan 19, 2010, at 3:05 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com >> > wrote: >> Nikunj would like to move the Indexed Database API spec to Last >> Call Working Draft (LCWD): >> >> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebSimpleDB/ >> >> If you have any comments, please send them to public-webapps@w3.org >> by February 2. >> >> Note the Process Document states the following regarding the >> significance/meaning of a LCWD: >> >> [[ >> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call >> Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that: >> >> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant >> technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements >> document) in the Working Draft; >> >> * the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant >> dependencies with other groups; >> >> * other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these >> dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call >> announcement is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to >> advance the technical report to later maturity levels. >> ]] >> >> Additionally, a LCWD should be considered feature-complete with all >> issues resolved. >> >> If there are other groups that should be asked for comments, please >> forward this email to them or identify the group(s). >> >> -Regards, Art Barstow >> >> >> We (Google) support this LC publication. >> >> We would, however, like time to gather meaningful experience with >> the spec before the last call review period ends. We expect we'll >> have this experience by the end of May. Would it be permissible to >> have a 4 month LC review period to facilitate this? > > We at Apple are also in reviewing the spec and would also like > additional time to review. How is the review coming along? It would be useful to get incremental feedback and comments rather than a large set all at once. Does Apple have an ETA for completing the review? > It doesn't matter that much to us if the review time is before or > during Last Call, but we definitely can't do a meaningful review by > February 2, and therefore cannot really sign off by that date on > whether the document has satisfied relevant technical requirements, > is feature-complete, and has all issues resolved. It would really help if we can all check whether IndexedDB satisfies relevant technical requirements. Besides inverted indexes, I have ruled out any other feature requests that seem to expand the scope of this spec without commensurate benefits. > > (As far as I can tell the document is less than 4 months old as an > Editor's Draft and is about 60 pages long, so I hope it is > reasonable to ask for some reasonable amount of review time.) > > Regards, > Maciej >
Received on Saturday, 13 March 2010 09:56:12 UTC