- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 17:29:14 -0700
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Anton Muhin <antonm@chromium.org>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, public-webapps@w3.org
On Mar 17, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, Anton Muhin wrote: >> >> For me performance-wise both approaches seem fine, but to get >> numbers I >> need to run an experiment. >> >> My main concern would be that rules are overcomplicated imho. And I >> won't be surprised if IE and FF would just ignore them. But you >> understand all those matters better than I do. >> >> BTW, as the proposed change would reduce stress on GC, I don't >> quite see >> how this could reduce compatibility (but life is often more >> complicated >> than I can imagine.) > > I've changed the HTML5 spec to allow arbitrary caching for the various > objects in HTML5 instead. We're probably going to make a change to do caching in WebKit, and we would still like to see appropriate errata to DOM Level 3 Core. Do we have anyone who is officially empowered to edit the errata? I can suggest wording. Regards, Maciej
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2010 00:29:48 UTC