- From: Scott Wilson <scott.bradley.wilson@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:21:20 +0000
- To: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>
- Cc: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, ext Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <EC972205-0007-4646-9A29-1D7D64652147@gmail.com>
On 17 Feb 2010, at 00:19, Harry Halpin wrote: > On 17 Feb 2010, at 00:19, Harry Halpin wrote: > > Yes, we over in the Social Web XG would be happy to provide some space > where efforts like this one can be done, in particular a "Social API > requirements" telecon and e-mail discussion with WebApps would be > great. Looking at the list made earlier: > > "* access to contacts on a specific device: Contacts API (DAP WG) [4]" > > This is obvious an important point, but we need to make sure that > Contacts API is compatible with PortableContacts/vCard, and maybe even > look at FOAF. Or simply that there is a reasonable abstraction over different approaches to handling contacts at the app/widget level E.g. Wave Gadgets has an extremely simplified user info model: id, display_name, thumbnail_src that would map easily onto any of the contact schemes discussed (and is surprisingly useful). By contrast, OpenSocial has a maximal scheme that encompasses all manner of bizarre attributes (SCARED_OF, HAPPIEST_WHEN etc), presumably the superset of everything the initial OS members stored about people! > " * access to relationships between contacts, etc.: no current work, > but possible as an online service (XHR), or locally through markup > like RDFa or microdata" - I think this could be covered by some new > API. > > Agreed, and we could also make sure that those in RDF have a > declarative metadata approach that is compatible with some new API, > but that users of such a API would not have to know about or use, i.e. > compatible but orthogonal. +1 > Personally, I believe that if the relevant stake-holders can be > brought on board, this would be a very worthy area for future > standardization and will do everything I can to help. Looking at our > schedule, we were hoping to have a call on this topic (i.e. W3C > Widgets and OpenSocial), March 10th (5 PM GMT) still works [1]. Yes, the 10th is still good for me too. Would you like me to ask the Apache Shindig developers if any of them can join us? > For a general update on our work, take a look at our minutes [2] and > wiki [3]. We'll have a draft final report out by end of March, but > expect the XG to be extended by 3-6 months as we are still in the > middle of a number of conversations. > > -harry > > [1]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/Schedule > [2]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/ > [3]http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 09:21:55 UTC