W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2010

RE: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication

From: David Rogers <david.rogers@omtp.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:57:54 -0000
Message-ID: <4C83800CE03F754ABA6BA928A6D94A0601FDC8DE@exch-be14.exchange.local>
To: "Arthur Barstow" <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, "Marcos Caceres" <marcosc@opera.com>
Cc: "public-webapps" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Thanks for that Art, I agree with you, that would also be the OMTP view.



-----Original Message-----
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:Art.Barstow@nokia.com] 
Sent: 03 February 2010 15:55
To: Marcos Caceres; David Rogers
Cc: public-webapps
Subject: Re: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2

On Feb 3, 2010, at 10:48 AM, ext David Rogers wrote:

> Are there formal points (e.g. 100,000 users etc.) at which this is  
> gated? I'm assuming that some organisations would wait until it  
> reached PR before implementing so your proposal could be somewhat  
> chicken and egg related.

Each CR defines its own "exit criteria". For this spec it is:


The Web Applications (WebApps) Working Group expects to request that  
the Director advance this document to Proposed Recommendation once  
the Working Group has demonstrated at least two interoperable  
implementations (interoperable meaning at least two implementations  
that pass each mandatory test in the [P&C-Test-Suite]). The WebApps  
Working Group expects to show these implementations as part of an  
Implementation Report and advance to Proposed Recommendation after 24  
January 2010.

Based on this criteria and what has been captured in the  
Implementation Report, it appears the exit criteria in the CR has  
been met:


-Art Barstow

Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 15:58:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:04 UTC