- From: David Rogers <david.rogers@omtp.org>
- Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 15:57:54 -0000
- To: "Arthur Barstow" <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>, "Marcos Caceres" <marcosc@opera.com>
- Cc: "public-webapps" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Thanks for that Art, I agree with you, that would also be the OMTP view. Cheers, David. -----Original Message----- From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:Art.Barstow@nokia.com] Sent: 03 February 2010 15:55 To: Marcos Caceres; David Rogers Cc: public-webapps Subject: Re: [widgets] P&C: comments submitted after 1-Dec-2009 CR#2 publication On Feb 3, 2010, at 10:48 AM, ext David Rogers wrote: > Are there formal points (e.g. 100,000 users etc.) at which this is > gated? I'm assuming that some organisations would wait until it > reached PR before implementing so your proposal could be somewhat > chicken and egg related. Each CR defines its own "exit criteria". For this spec it is: [[ http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-widgets-20091201/#sotd The Web Applications (WebApps) Working Group expects to request that the Director advance this document to Proposed Recommendation once the Working Group has demonstrated at least two interoperable implementations (interoperable meaning at least two implementations that pass each mandatory test in the [P&C-Test-Suite]). The WebApps Working Group expects to show these implementations as part of an Implementation Report and advance to Proposed Recommendation after 24 January 2010. ]] Based on this criteria and what has been captured in the Implementation Report, it appears the exit criteria in the CR has been met: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/imp-report/ -Art Barstow
Received on Wednesday, 3 February 2010 15:58:40 UTC