Re: [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial)

On Jan 5, 2010, at 23:29 , Marcos Caceres wrote:
> Yeah, admittedly, it got a little messy wrt what defines a rule and
> what defines a step... that was me doing crazy literary experiments in
> the hope of making the spec easier to read and work with... I wanted
> to write rules like they were reusable functions, and the Steps as if
> they were independent parts of a program... not sure if I succeeded,

FWIW I found it really useful. While implementing I basically made every rule into a method, then wrote the steps as one big processing chunk and it proved to be really simple.

-- 
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/