- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:12:30 -0800
- To: Pierre-Antoine LaFayette <pierre.lafayette@gmail.com>
- Cc: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:24 AM, Pierre-Antoine LaFayette <pierre.lafayette@gmail.com> wrote: > Adam, could you provide your thoughts on using about:icon? I'd prefer not to use about:icon, but I don't think it matters much. Currently, the only URL in the about scheme that's accessible to web content is about:blank. I believe Internet Explorer has a "res" scheme that might be more appropriate. That's a general way to refer to browser-provided resources with URLs. Perhaps res:icon?ext=html&size=32 At a higher level, we could bikeshed about the name forever. You should pick whatever you think is most aesthetic since you're driving the process. Adam
Received on Thursday, 28 January 2010 08:13:24 UTC