- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:25:39 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- cc: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:
> Sounds good to me, although I think I would also rephrase somewhat the
> algorithm, à la:
> * the URI's scheme component is the same as scheme; and
> * if subdomains is false or if the URI's host component is not a domain
> name (as defined in RFC1034), the URI's host component is the same as
> host; or
> * if subdomains is true, the URI's host component is either the same as
> host, or is a subdomain of host (as defined in RFC1034); and
> * ...
I didn't check if the clarifications of RFC1034 added by RFC2181 applies
to your case, but it is worth checking.
(Cf: [1] and [2]).
Cheers,
[1] http://www.dns.net/dnsrd/rfc/#rfc1034
[2] http://www.dns.net/dnsrd/rfc/#rfc2181
--
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.
~~Yves
Received on Monday, 29 March 2010 14:25:41 UTC