- From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:25:39 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- cc: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Sounds good to me, although I think I would also rephrase somewhat the > algorithm, à la: > * the URI's scheme component is the same as scheme; and > * if subdomains is false or if the URI's host component is not a domain > name (as defined in RFC1034), the URI's host component is the same as > host; or > * if subdomains is true, the URI's host component is either the same as > host, or is a subdomain of host (as defined in RFC1034); and > * ... I didn't check if the clarifications of RFC1034 added by RFC2181 applies to your case, but it is worth checking. (Cf: [1] and [2]). Cheers, [1] http://www.dns.net/dnsrd/rfc/#rfc1034 [2] http://www.dns.net/dnsrd/rfc/#rfc2181 -- Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras. ~~Yves
Received on Monday, 29 March 2010 14:25:41 UTC