Re: [WARP] comment on subdomains

On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote:

> Sounds good to me, although I think I would also rephrase somewhat the
> algorithm, à la:
> * the URI's scheme component is the same as scheme; and
> * if subdomains is false or if the URI's host component is not a domain
> name (as defined in RFC1034), the URI's host component is the same as
> host; or
> * if subdomains is true, the URI's host component is either the same as
> host, or is a subdomain of host (as defined in RFC1034); and
> * ...

I didn't check if the clarifications of RFC1034 added by RFC2181 applies 
to your case, but it is worth checking.
(Cf: [1] and [2]).
Cheers,

[1] http://www.dns.net/dnsrd/rfc/#rfc1034
[2] http://www.dns.net/dnsrd/rfc/#rfc2181

-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves

Received on Monday, 29 March 2010 14:25:41 UTC