- From: Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 10:41:23 -0800
- To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote: >> What happens with Set-Cookie headers included in uniform responses? >> It seems like we ought to ignore them based on the principle that UMP >> requests are made from a state store / context that is completely >> separate from the user agents normal state store / context. > > That's a good point. I'll add text to that effect. This new text is at: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/UMP/#state-changes I've also removed the recommendation to omit headers about the user-agent. http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/UMP/#request-sending Thanks, --Tyler -- "Waterken News: Capability security on the Web" http://waterken.sourceforge.net/recent.html
Received on Saturday, 9 January 2010 18:41:55 UTC