Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read

On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote:
>> What happens with Set-Cookie headers included in uniform responses?
>> It seems like we ought to ignore them based on the principle that UMP
>> requests are made from a state store / context that is completely
>> separate from the user agents normal state store / context.
>
> That's a good point. I'll add text to that effect.

This new text is at:

http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/UMP/#state-changes

I've also removed the recommendation to omit headers about the user-agent.

http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/UMP/#request-sending

Thanks,
--Tyler

-- 
"Waterken News: Capability security on the Web"
http://waterken.sourceforge.net/recent.html