W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2010

Re: [UMP] Feedback on UMP from a quick read

From: Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 10:41:23 -0800
Message-ID: <5691356f1001091041m1a90eec9ia43edb764b2b1b42@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Tyler Close <tyler.close@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote:
>> What happens with Set-Cookie headers included in uniform responses?
>> It seems like we ought to ignore them based on the principle that UMP
>> requests are made from a state store / context that is completely
>> separate from the user agents normal state store / context.
> That's a good point. I'll add text to that effect.

This new text is at:


I've also removed the recommendation to omit headers about the user-agent.



"Waterken News: Capability security on the Web"
Received on Saturday, 9 January 2010 18:41:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:04 UTC