- From: Marcos Caceres <marcosc@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 23:54:26 +0100
- To: "cyril.concolato" <cyril.concolato@telecom-paristech.fr>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr> wrote: > Hi, > > The test df.wgt contains a feature without name. In this case, the feature > element is ignored and the widget remains valid. > The test d4.wgt contains an invalid feature name. In this case, the widget > should be considered as invalid. I don't understand that. I understand the > rationale that if a feature is required, the UA shall not process the > widget. Whether it does or not understand the feature, it doesn't matter. Is > it because you foresee evolution in the syntax of feature names, which > wouldn't be IRI ? If not, I suggest to make this test pass and ignore the > feature element. > Sorry, but it was a resolution that all correctly named features are considered required (it's why we had to create the required attribute). I'm against changing this. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Tuesday, 5 January 2010 22:55:00 UTC