On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Pablo Castro <Pablo.Castro@microsoft.com>wrote: > 2. Values > > a. 3.1.2: isn't the requirement for "structured clones" too much? It > would mean implementations would have to be able to store and retrieve File > objects and such. Would it be more appropriate to say it's just graphs of > Javascript primitive objects/values (object, string, number, date, arrays, > null)? > If LocalStorage is able to store structured clones, then I'm not sure if there's too much of an additional burden on implementations. I think we should either change both to "graphs of javascript primitives" or leave both as "structured clones". As a data point: does anyone currently plan on implementing the structured clone requirement of the WebStorage spec?
Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2010 18:59:02 UTC